NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Peter Foreman
SIPPY DOWNS QLD 4556
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 1 June 2015
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Bernard Morrison
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for the supervision and administration of superannuation funds in Australia. This legislation was introduced to address the need for ensuring the integrity, efficiency, and proper management of superannuation funds, which are critical for the financial security of retirees. The Act was passed by the Parliament of Australia with the policy objective of protecting the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers are fit and proper persons. This includes maintaining high standards of conduct and competence among those who manage these funds. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation, through delegates, to disqualify individuals deemed unsuitable for such roles, thereby safeguarding the superannuation system from mismanagement and misconduct. The disqualification process, as evidenced by the notice provided, is a critical mechanism within the SISA to uphold the standards required for the administration of superannuation entities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and oversight of superannuation funds in Australia. It encompasses trustees, responsible officers, and other relevant personnel within the superannuation industry, imposing a duty on them to act as fit and proper persons. The SISA has a national jurisdictional reach, impacting all entities and individuals operating within the superannuation industry across the Commonwealth, states, territories, and any associated external territories of Australia. The Act does not explicitly state exclusions or exemptions but operates within the framework of overarching financial and superannuation regulations. The application and enforcement of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments and regulations, which may provide additional specific guidance or exceptions to its provisions. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation entities, as demonstrated in the provided notice to Peter Foreman, ensuring that the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds are upheld.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) that are relevant to the notice of disqualification include subsection 126A(3) (3), which empowers a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a superannuation entity if they are not considered a fit and proper person to hold such a role. Subsection 126A(6) (6) mandates the issuance of a written notice of disqualification to the affected individual. Furthermore, subsection 126A(7) (7) requires that the particulars of this disqualification be published in the Gazette, ensuring public transparency.
The SISA imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Trustees and responsible officers must maintain their fitness and propriety to continue their roles effectively. This includes adhering to professional standards, acting in the best interests of the superannuation fund's members, and ensuring compliance with all relevant legislative and regulatory requirements. Additionally, the Act requires trustees to provide regular and accurate reporting to the Australian Taxation Office and to maintain proper records of their activities and decisions.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the SISA can result in severe consequences. Subsection 126A(3) (3) allows for the disqualification of individuals deemed unfit, which is a critical safeguard to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The penalties for breaches of the SISA can include significant fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. Specifically, under section 130 (130), individuals found guilty of dishonestly causing loss to a superannuation fund can be subject to fines of up to $210,000 and/or imprisonment for up to 10 years. Additionally, corporations can be fined up to $1,050,000 (1,050,000) under the same section. These stringent penalties underscore the importance of compliance with the Act.
Furthermore, the SISA provides avenues for review and reconsideration. Subsection 126A(5) (5) allows for the revocation of a disqualification notice either by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon written application by the disqualified individual. Section 344 (344) of the Act also enables a person affected by a decision to request a reconsideration from the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision, provided that the request includes the reasons for the dissatisfaction. This ensures that affected parties have a mechanism to seek redress and potentially rectify any perceived injustices in the disqualification process.