NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Paul Evett
Ellenbrook WA 6069
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 19 September 2013
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner Taxation
Per Gerard Carney
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address issues and gaps in the regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act was introduced to ensure that superannuation funds are managed with the highest standards of care and to protect the interests of fund members. The policy objective of the SIS Act is to maintain confidence in the superannuation system by ensuring that trustees and other responsible officers act in the best interests of fund members and comply with legislative requirements. The Act provides a framework for the supervision and regulation of superannuation funds, including the power to disqualify individuals who fail to meet these standards.
This notice of disqualification under subsection 126A(6) of the SIS Act is an example of the enforcement mechanisms available to the Commissioner of Taxation to uphold the integrity of the superannuation system. The notice informs Mr Paul Evett that he has been disqualified from serving as a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity due to contraventions of the SIS Act. The disqualification is effective immediately upon the issuance of the notice, and the decision can be subject to reconsideration or revocation under the provisions of the Act. The notice also informs Mr Evett of his rights to request a review of the decision and the requirement to publish particulars of the disqualification in the Gazette.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation entities, such as trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act applies to the Commonwealth of Australia and is concerned with the proper administration and regulation of superannuation funds. The Act extends to disqualify individuals who have contravened its provisions from acting as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities. The disqualification can be imposed if the contraventions are significant in nature and seriousness, as determined by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. This notice is issued under the authority of the Act and takes immediate effect upon issuance. Furthermore, the Act allows for the potential revocation of the disqualification order either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified individual, and also provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied with the outcome.
Key Provisions
The notice issued under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) informs Mr Paul Evett that he has been disqualified from holding positions such as a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate involved with superannuation entities. This decision was made by Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, who is satisfied that Mr Evett has contravened the SIS Act on multiple occasions, warranting a disqualification order. The disqualification order becomes effective on the date of the notice, as stated in the document dated 19 September 2013.
The SIS Act imposes several obligations on individuals and entities within the superannuation industry. Trustees and responsible officers are required to adhere to the Act's provisions to ensure the proper management and administration of superannuation funds. These obligations include maintaining accurate records, acting in the best interests of the fund members, and ensuring compliance with all relevant legislative requirements. Failure to meet these obligations can lead to serious consequences, including disqualification as outlined in this notice.
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, the particulars of the disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette, ensuring transparency and informing the public of the decision. This publication serves to notify other stakeholders within the industry and the broader public about the disqualification of Mr Evett, thereby maintaining accountability within the superannuation sector.
The notice also highlights the possibility of revocation of the disqualification order. As per subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, the disqualification order may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by Mr Evett. This provides an avenue for Mr Evett to seek reinstatement if he believes the decision was unjust or if circumstances have changed that warrant reconsideration. Additionally, section 344 of the SIS Act allows Mr Evett to request a reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if he is dissatisfied with the outcome. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must include the reasons for the request. This ensures that affected parties have a formal process to challenge the decision and seek redress if they believe it was made in error.