NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Mr Nguyen L Le
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Nguyen L Le
LIDCOMBE NSW 2141
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 13 January 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide a regulatory framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry, ensuring that superannuation funds are managed responsibly and in the best interests of members. The Act was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of superannuation entities, given the significant amount of money involved and the long-term financial security it represents for millions of Australians. The policy objective of the SISA is to protect superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians comply with the regulatory requirements designed to safeguard their investments. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry if they have been involved in breaches of the Act, thereby maintaining the integrity and reliability of the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds within Australia. Specifically, it targets responsible officers of corporate trustees, such as Mr. Nguyen L Le, who have been found to contravene the Act's provisions. The Act’s jurisdiction extends nationally across Australia, as it is a Commonwealth Act. Mr. Nguyen L Le, identified as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities, has been disqualified under the Act for contraventions that provide grounds for disqualification. This disqualification prohibits him from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity and from being a responsible officer of a body corporate involved in these roles. The disqualification is effective immediately from the date of notice. Additionally, it is an offence under the Act for a disqualified person to act in these capacities, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The Act allows for the disqualification to be revoked by the Commissioner, either on their own initiative or upon application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, Mr. Le has the right to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) as evidenced in the disqualification notice pertain to sections 126A, 126K, and 344. Section 126A(2) allows the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify an individual if they are a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that has contravened the SISA and the nature of the contravention warrants such action. Section 126A(6) mandates the giving of notice to the disqualified person, which in this case is Mr. Nguyen L Le, informing him of the disqualification. Section 126K prohibits a disqualified person from acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian of a superannuation entity, or a responsible officer of such a body corporate, with a maximum penalty of two years in jail for contravening this provision. Section 344 provides a mechanism for Mr. Le to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving notice of the disqualification.
The Act imposes several obligations on Mr. Le and the entities he governs. As a responsible officer, Mr. Le is required to ensure that the corporate trustee complies with the SISA and avoids any actions that might result in contraventions. The Act also requires Mr. Le to refrain from acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity if he is disqualified. Additionally, the Act requires the Commissioner or the delegate to provide a written notice of disqualification and to publish details of the disqualification in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
The SISA provides for several offences and consequences for breach of its provisions. Section 126K imposes a criminal offence on any disqualified person who acts in contravention of the prohibition against being or acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment. Mr. Le is also provided with the opportunity to request reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving notice, as per section 344. Failure to comply with the disqualification notice or the provisions of the SISA may result in further legal action, including potential imprisonment.
Mr. Le has the right to apply for revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA. The disqualification may be revoked either by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation on their own initiative or upon Mr. Le’s written application. However, any attempt by Mr. Le to act in contravention of the disqualification provisions may result in further penalties, including imprisonment. The disqualification notice also informs Mr. Le that details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA.