NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
MR MICHAEL J GOULD
QUINNS ROCKS WA 6030
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee investment manager custodian, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee investment manager custodian of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 23 June 2015
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Gerard Carney
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for robust regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry, particularly to ensure that trustees and other officials are fit and proper persons to manage superannuation funds. The Act provides a legislative framework to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by imposing obligations on trustees, custodians, and other officials. This includes the power to disqualify individuals deemed unsuitable for such roles. In the case of Mr. Michael J. Gould, a disqualification notice was issued under subsection 126A(6) of the Act by Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, asserting that Mr. Gould is not a fit and proper person to serve as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The policy objective of this disqualification is to uphold the integrity and accountability of the superannuation industry, ensuring that only suitable individuals manage and oversee superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) governs the administration and regulation of superannuation funds in Australia, ensuring that they are managed properly and in the best interests of members. This Act applies to a wide range of individuals and entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. It imposes obligations and standards on these parties to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. The reach of the Act extends throughout Australia, encompassing both Commonwealth and state jurisdictions, thereby providing a unified framework for the regulation of superannuation across the country. Exclusions or exemptions from the Act are limited and generally pertain to specific types of funds or circumstances as detailed in the Act or under subordinate legislation. The Act’s provisions can be extended or further defined through regulations or other instruments made under its authority, allowing for adjustments and refinements in response to changing circumstances or emerging issues in the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the notice, provided under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), are subsections 126A(6) and 126A(3). Subsection 126A(6) requires that the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, in this case Alison Lendon, provide a notice of disqualification to the individual concerned, Mr Michael J Gould. Subsection 126A(3) allows for the disqualification of an individual if the delegate is satisfied that the person is not a fit and proper person to hold a specified role within the superannuation industry. In this instance, the notice states that Mr Gould has been disqualified from being a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that acts as any of these roles for a superannuation entity.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. It mandates that individuals in specified roles within the superannuation industry must be deemed fit and proper persons. This includes trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The Act provides the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals who do not meet these fitness standards. Furthermore, the Act requires that any disqualification notices be published in the Gazette, as stipulated in subsection 126A(7). This ensures transparency and public notification of such actions.
There are specific processes and potential outcomes outlined in the notice regarding the disqualification. Subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows the delegate to revoke the disqualification order either on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. Additionally, if Mr Gould is dissatisfied with the decision, he has the right to request a reconsideration from the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, as per section 344 of the Act. This reconsideration process must be in writing and must include reasons for the request.
Regarding the consequences of breach, the notice does not explicitly state the penalties or consequences of failing to adhere to the disqualification. However, under the SISA, the penalties for non-compliance with the Act can be significant, including fines and imprisonment. The specific penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach. For example, under section 139 of the SISA, a person who contravenes the Act may be liable for a penalty of up to $21,000 for a corporation and $4,200 for an individual, along with potential imprisonment terms. These penalties underscore the seriousness with which the Act is enforced to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry.