NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Mathew Henry Grant Collett
BALMAIN NSW 2041
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 3 January 2014
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Grivell
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to provide a regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation funds in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the proper administration and management of these funds. This legislation was introduced to address the problem of inadequate oversight and regulation in the superannuation industry, which could potentially lead to mismanagement, fraud, and other misconduct that could adversely affect the financial security of fund members. The Act is administered by the Australian Government and its policy objective is to safeguard the financial welfare of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers adhere to high standards of conduct and compliance. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from acting as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act in a manner that warrants such action.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to trustees, responsible officers, trustees of body corporates, investment managers, custodians, and any other entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds within Australia. The Act encompasses the entire Commonwealth and applies to all industries and conduct related to the management and oversight of superannuation entities. The disqualification order made under the SIS Act is specific to Mr Mathew Henry Grant Collett, who has been found to have contravened the SIS Act, thereby leading to his disqualification from holding positions of trust and responsibility in the superannuation industry. The disqualification order extends its reach across all jurisdictions within Australia, ensuring a uniform application of the Act's provisions. The Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions but focuses on the severity and nature of contraventions that can lead to disqualification. Additionally, the Act allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, providing flexibility in enforcement and administration.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) contains provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals from certain roles within superannuation entities. Section 126A(6) of the Act mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must give notice to the affected individual when making a decision to disqualify them from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate involved in managing superannuation funds. The notice specifies the grounds for disqualification, which in this case, involves the individual having contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions. The disqualification takes immediate effect on the date of the notice.
The obligations imposed by the SIS Act on individuals in the superannuation industry are stringent. Trustees and responsible officers must comply with all provisions of the Act to avoid any potential contraventions that could lead to disqualification. This includes adhering to fiduciary duties, ensuring proper management and investment of superannuation funds, and maintaining accurate records. Failure to meet these obligations can result in serious consequences, including disqualification from managing superannuation entities.
The SIS Act provides for civil and criminal penalties for breaches of its provisions. Section 126A(1) empowers the delegate to disqualify an individual from holding certain roles if they are found to have contravened the Act. This disqualification is intended to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and maintain the integrity of the superannuation system. Additionally, under section 126A(7), particulars of the disqualification notice are published in the Gazette, ensuring transparency and accountability within the industry.
In the event of a disqualification, the affected individual has the right to request reconsideration of the decision. As per section 344 of the SIS Act, this request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision. The request should include the reasons for dissatisfaction with the disqualification. Furthermore, the disqualification order can be revoked either on the initiative of the delegate or upon written application by the disqualified individual, as stipulated in subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act. This provides a mechanism for rectifying any perceived injustices or misunderstandings in the initial decision-making process.