NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Josh Rogers
Gavin Parsons and Associates
Suite 1, 36 Carrington Street,
Sydney NSW 2000.
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being, or acting as:
a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, investment manager or custodian, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 22 September 2014
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Bernard Morrison
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate and supervise the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The legislation provides a framework for the establishment, operation, and oversight of superannuation funds, ensuring that they are managed prudently and in the best interests of the members. The enactment of this Act was crucial in addressing the need for stringent regulations in the superannuation sector to prevent mismanagement and potential financial harm to members. The SISA is administered by the Parliament of Australia, with the objective of maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. The notice of disqualification, as outlined in the document, is an example of the measures implemented under the Act to enforce compliance and maintain the standards required of industry participants.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate bodies that perform these roles. The Act has a Commonwealth reach, governing entities and individuals across Australia. The disqualification decision under this Act applies to Mr. Josh Rogers, who is prohibited from acting in any capacity as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds these roles. The decision to disqualify Mr. Rogers was made due to the delegate's satisfaction that he is not a fit and proper person to hold such positions, effective from the date of notice. The Act allows for the revocation of such disqualifications and provides avenues for reconsideration or appeal by the affected party within a specified timeframe. Subordinate instruments may extend or further define the application of the Act, but specific details on these are not outlined in the provided text.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides mechanisms for disqualification of individuals from certain roles within the superannuation industry. Under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation may disqualify an individual from being or acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or a responsible officer of a body corporate involved in such roles. This action is taken if the delegate is satisfied that the individual is not a fit and proper person for these roles. The decision to disqualify Mr. Josh Rogers, as communicated in the notice, is grounded on this provision. Mr. Rogers has been disqualified from his roles, and this order takes effect immediately upon the notice being issued.
The Act imposes obligations on the parties involved to ensure compliance with its provisions. For Mr. Rogers, the primary obligation is to refrain from acting in any capacity as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds these roles. The Act also mandates that particulars of such disqualification orders be published in the Gazette (subsection 126A(7) of the SISA). Additionally, the Act allows for the revocation of the disqualification order either on the initiative of the delegate or upon written application by the disqualified person (subsection 126A(5) of the SISA). For Mr. Rogers, this means he must comply with the disqualification order and, if he wishes to seek revocation, he must make a written application to that effect within the stipulated timeframe.
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 establishes consequences for non-compliance with its provisions. Disregarding the disqualification order could lead to significant legal ramifications. Although the specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the notice, under the general legal framework, breaches of such administrative orders can lead to civil penalties, fines, or even criminal charges, depending on the severity and intent behind the non-compliance. The maximum penalties can vary, but they are intended to enforce adherence to the regulatory requirements governing the superannuation industry. For Mr. Rogers, this implies that failure to comply with the disqualification order could result in severe legal consequences, including potential civil or criminal penalties.