NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Mr Jagadish Javaraiah
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Jagadish Javaraiah
CRANBOURNE EAST VIC 3977
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 23 February 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Donna Williams
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for stringent regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the proper administration and management of superannuation funds. One of the key problems it aimed to address was the potential for misconduct and mismanagement within the superannuation industry, which could jeopardise the financial security of superannuation fund members. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by enforcing compliance with regulatory requirements and imposing penalties for non-compliance. Through the powers granted under this Act, the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify individuals who have contravened the Act, ensuring that those who engage in serious misconduct are prevented from participating in the management of superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, encompassing trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act operates at the Commonwealth level, governing practices across Australia. The Act's disqualification provisions target individuals who have contravened its provisions, with the seriousness of the contravention determining the applicability of disqualification. The disqualification prevents the affected person from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry, such as being a trustee or investment manager, and can be enforced through the publication of disqualification notices in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. While the primary Act sets out the framework and penalties, subordinate instruments may further define the scope and application of the disqualification provisions. Additionally, the Act provides for reconsideration and potential revocation of disqualification notices, ensuring procedural fairness to those affected.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened its provisions. Under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation may disqualify an individual if they are satisfied that the individual has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualification. The notice of disqualification, as seen in the document, is served on the disqualified individual, stating the reasons for the disqualification and its effective date. In this case, Mr Jagadish Javaraiah has been disqualified under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA due to contraventions of the Act. This disqualification notice will also be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, as per subsection 126A(7) of the SISA.
The SISA imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties or entities it governs. For example, it requires trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities to adhere to specific standards of conduct and governance, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds. It also mandates responsible officers and body corporates that are trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities to comply with the Act's provisions. Failure to meet these obligations may result in disqualification under the SISA.
The SISA contains provisions that outline offences and penalties for breach. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person who knows they are disqualified to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or body corporate of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years in jail. Additionally, the SISA allows for the revocation of a disqualification under subsection 126A(5), either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual.
In the event that an individual affected by a disqualification decision is not satisfied with it, they can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision under section 344 of the SISA. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision and must include the reasons the individual believes the decision is wrong. This process provides an opportunity for the affected individual to challenge the disqualification and potentially have it overturned or amended.