NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
MR HUNG CAO
BANKSTOWN NSW 2200
I, Ivan Parrett a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 26 February 2014
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Per Gerard Carney
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address issues and provide oversight within the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers act in the best interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced to fill a critical gap in regulatory oversight, aiming to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by establishing stringent compliance and governance requirements for trustees and responsible officers. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened its provisions, ensuring that only those who meet the required standards manage superannuation funds. The decision to disqualify Mr. Hung Cao from being a trustee or a responsible officer under this Act reflects the seriousness of his contraventions, aligning with the policy objective of maintaining high standards of conduct within the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. It covers a range of conduct and transactions related to the administration and regulation of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with the standards and requirements set out in the Act. The Act extends across the Commonwealth of Australia and applies to all superannuation entities operating within the country. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals from holding positions of responsibility within these entities if they have contravened the Act in a manner that warrants such action. The disqualification orders can be made by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation and are subject to specific procedural requirements, including the right of the affected individual to request reconsideration of the decision within a stipulated timeframe. The Act also allows for the publication of particulars of disqualification orders in the Gazette and provides for the potential revocation of such orders under certain conditions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions that allow the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from holding certain positions in superannuation entities. In this case, section 126A(6) mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner, such as Ivan Parrett, must give written notice to the affected individual when a decision is made to disqualify them from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The notice must clearly state the reasons for the disqualification, as seen in the notice provided to Mr Hung Cao.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties it governs are stringent. Trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities must adhere to the provisions outlined in the SISA to avoid any contraventions that could lead to disqualification. These obligations include ensuring compliance with all legal requirements related to the management and administration of superannuation funds. Failure to meet these obligations can result in serious consequences, including disqualification.
The SISA also outlines specific offences and penalties for breaches of its provisions. Section 126A(1) allows for disqualification if there is a contravention of the Act and the nature and seriousness of the contravention justifies such action. The disqualification order is immediate and takes effect on the day the notice is made, as indicated in the notice to Mr Cao. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA provides a process for reconsideration of the disqualification decision if the affected individual is dissatisfied with the outcome. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must include the reasons for the request.
Furthermore, the SISA mandates that particulars of the disqualification notice be published in the Gazette, as required by subsection 126A(7). This public notice serves to inform the broader community of the disqualification and the reasons behind it. Moreover, the Act allows for the revocation of the disqualification order either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual, as per subsection 126A(5). This provides a mechanism for the individual to potentially regain their eligibility to hold positions within superannuation entities after rectifying the issues that led to the disqualification.