NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Mr Graham H Wilson
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Graham H Wilson
SMITHFIELD NSW 2164
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provide grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 1 August 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Christiane Boissezon
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to provide for the effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. This Act, passed by the Australian Parliament, seeks to ensure that the superannuation industry is conducted in a way that is efficient, effective, and in the best interests of members. One of the key provisions of the Act is the ability to disqualify individuals who have been involved in significant breaches of the Act while acting as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee. The disqualification aims to deter misconduct and maintain the integrity of the superannuation system. The notice of disqualification issued under this Act serves to inform the affected individual of their disqualification and the serious consequences of their actions, including potential criminal penalties and the prohibition from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate trustees. The Act has a Commonwealth reach, applying across Australia and governing the conduct of superannuation trustees and their officers. The disqualification under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA pertains specifically to Mr. Graham H Wilson, who has been found to be a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the SISA, thereby warranting his disqualification. The Act also extends its reach through subordinate instruments, such as regulations and guidelines, to further define and regulate the conduct of those involved in superannuation management. Exclusions or exemptions from the Act are not explicitly mentioned in the gazette notice, but the Act may contain specific provisions addressing these aspects in its main body or through subordinate legislation.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued to Mr Graham H Wilson under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs him that he has been disqualified from acting as a responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This disqualification was made pursuant to subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, which allows for the disqualification of individuals based on the serious nature of contraventions committed by the corporate trustee of which they were a responsible officer at the time. This decision was made by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, who cited that Mr Wilson was a responsible officer when the contraventions occurred, and the seriousness of these actions warranted his disqualification. This disqualification is effective immediately from the date of the notice, which was 1 August 2023.
The Act imposes several obligations on parties and entities it governs. For responsible officers, one of the primary obligations is to ensure compliance with all provisions of the SISA. This includes maintaining proper records, adhering to investment standards, and reporting obligations. Additionally, corporate trustees must appoint only eligible persons as responsible officers, and these individuals must act with due diligence and in the best interests of the superannuation fund members. Under the SISA, Mr Wilson, as a former responsible officer, would have had these obligations placed upon him before his disqualification.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA can result in significant legal consequences. For instance, section 126K of the SISA makes it an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such an entity. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance. Furthermore, the disqualification notice informs that the details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, adding a layer of public accountability. The notice also provides an avenue for Mr Wilson to apply for the revocation of his disqualification under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, either on his own initiative or through a written application. If dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, Mr Wilson has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider it in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice, as outlined in section 344 of the SISA.