NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Mr Fabio Ferreira Da Silva
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Fabio Ferreira Da Silva
BEACONSFIELD QLD 4740
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 2 November 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for effective regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This Act was introduced to ensure the integrity, efficiency, and soundness of the superannuation system, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act is administered by the Australian Parliament, with a clear policy objective of maintaining high standards of conduct and governance within the superannuation sector. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have breached its provisions, as demonstrated in the notice issued to Mr Fabio Ferreira Da Silva. This disqualification aims to prevent individuals with a history of serious contraventions from participating in the management or oversight of superannuation entities, thereby safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) governs the management and supervision of superannuation entities in Australia, impacting a wide range of individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry. This Act applies to persons who act as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, as well as to responsible officers or bodies corporate that undertake these roles. The Act's jurisdiction extends nationally, ensuring consistent regulation across all states and territories of Australia. The SISA includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who contravene its regulations, with such disqualifications being both immediate and publicly notifiable. Notably, the Act also imposes severe penalties for disqualified persons who continue to engage in prohibited activities, with potential criminal sanctions of up to two years imprisonment. Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for both the revocation of disqualifications and the reconsideration of decisions by the Commissioner of Taxation, offering avenues for review and potential relief for affected parties.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued to Mr Fabio Ferreira Da Silva under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs him that he has been disqualified from participating in the management of superannuation entities due to his contravention of the SISA (subsection 126A(1)). The notice explicitly states that the disqualification is effective from the date of issuance, which is 2 November 2022, and is signed by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. The grounds for the disqualification are based on the seriousness of the contraventions, although the specific nature of the contraventions is not detailed in the notice.
The Act imposes specific obligations on Mr Da Silva, prohibiting him from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that serves in these roles (section 126K). This prohibition is designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that only individuals and entities of good standing manage their retirement savings. The disqualification aims to uphold the integrity and proper functioning of the superannuation industry, thereby maintaining public trust in retirement savings management.
Breaching the provisions outlined in section 126K of the SISA constitutes an offence, carrying a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This severe penalty underscores the seriousness with which the law treats misconduct in the management of superannuation funds. By disqualifying Mr Da Silva, the Act aims to deter such behaviour and maintain high standards of conduct within the industry. Furthermore, the notice provides information on the potential for revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon application by Mr Da Silva.
In the event that Mr Da Silva is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, he has the right to request a reconsideration under section 344 of the SISA. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should outline the reasons for believing the decision to be incorrect. This provision ensures that affected individuals have a formal avenue to challenge the decision, thereby providing a measure of procedural fairness and protecting their rights within the legal process.