NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Duy Tan Pham
VILLAWOOD NSW 2163
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 18 December 2013.
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Per Craig Blair
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted to address issues in the supervision of superannuation funds, aiming to ensure their proper management and the protection of members' interests. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament and has the policy objective of maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation industry. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from being trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities if they have contravened the Act, ensuring that those who misuse their positions are held accountable. The disqualification process, as exemplified by the notice issued to Mr Duy Tan Pham, reflects the Act’s commitment to enforcing compliance and safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation entities. Specifically, it applies to trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, as well as any responsible officers within these entities. The Act has a national reach, applying throughout Australia, and its provisions govern the conduct and transactions associated with superannuation funds. The Act can impose disqualification orders on individuals who contravene its provisions, as evidenced by the notice of disqualification to Mr Duy Tan Pham, a resident of Villawood, NSW. The grounds for such disqualification include multiple contraventions of the Act that are deemed serious enough to warrant such a measure. The Act also allows for the revocation of disqualification orders and provides avenues for affected parties to seek reconsideration of the decision within a specified timeframe. Subordinate instruments may extend or specify certain aspects of the Act’s application, ensuring flexibility and precision in its enforcement.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) includes specific provisions related to the disqualification of individuals from holding certain roles within superannuation entities. In this context, section 126A(6) mandates the issuance of a notice of disqualification to an individual, such as Mr. Duy Tan Pham, when a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation decides to disqualify them from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that manages superannuation entities. This disqualification can be triggered if the delegate is satisfied that the individual has contravened the SIS Act, and the nature, seriousness, and number of these contraventions justify such a measure. The notice informs the individual that the disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance.
Under the SIS Act, the obligations imposed on individuals like Mr. Pham, who have been disqualified, are primarily to refrain from acting as a trustee or a responsible officer of any superannuation entity. This restriction is intended to prevent further breaches of the Act by individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds. The Act also imposes a duty on the disqualified individual to comply with any additional conditions or requirements set by the Commissioner of Taxation, such as providing detailed information about their financial affairs or submitting to regular audits.
The Act provides several mechanisms to address potential breaches of its provisions. Section 126A(5) allows the Commissioner to revoke a disqualification order, either on their own initiative or upon receiving a written application from the disqualified individual. Such revocations may be considered if there is evidence that the individual has addressed the issues that led to their disqualification or if there are substantial changes in circumstances. Furthermore, section 344 of the SIS Act allows affected individuals to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be in writing and include reasons for the appeal.
Failure to comply with the disqualification order or other provisions of the SIS Act can result in significant consequences. The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties in the provided excerpt, but it is well-established under Australian law that breaches of financial management and supervision acts can lead to substantial penalties. These can include fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity and frequency of the breaches. The exact penalties would be determined by the court considering the specifics of each case, but they can be severe, reflecting the importance of maintaining integrity within the superannuation industry.