NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr David Etheridge
HAMPTON VIC 3188
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA as I am satisfied you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 25 March 2015
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner
Per Paul Cipolla
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation was introduced by the Parliament of Australia to ensure that the superannuation industry operates in a manner that protects the interests of superannuation fund members. The policy objective of the SIS Act is to maintain the integrity, efficiency, and stability of the superannuation industry by imposing various regulatory and compliance requirements on trustees, investment managers, and other related entities. One of the key mechanisms through which the SIS Act achieves this objective is the power to disqualify individuals from holding positions of responsibility within the superannuation industry if they have contravened the provisions of the Act. The notice provided to Mr David Etheridge under subsection 126A(6) of the SIS Act is an example of this mechanism in action, whereby Mr Etheridge has been disqualified from being a trustee or responsible officer of a body corporate due to his contraventions of the Act.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. In the context of this legislation, Mr David Etheridge has been disqualified from serving as a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that manages superannuation entities. This disqualification is pursuant to subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act, following a determination that Mr Etheridge has contravened the Act on multiple occasions, with the breaches being of such nature, seriousness, and frequency as to warrant this action. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice. The jurisdiction and reach of this Act are national, as it is a Commonwealth statute. However, the Act also extends its application through subordinate instruments which can provide further clarification or detail on specific aspects of the legislation. Additionally, while the Act broadly applies to relevant entities and persons, there are provisions that allow for the revocation of disqualification orders under certain conditions, and avenues for reconsideration or appeal are available to affected parties within a specified timeframe.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) contains provisions for the disqualification of individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities. Under section 126A(6), a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can issue a notice of disqualification to a person believed to have contravened the Act. In this case, Mr David Etheridge of Hampton, VIC, has been disqualified from being a trustee or a responsible officer of any body corporate that acts as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian for a superannuation entity. This disqualification is pursuant to section 126A(1), which allows for disqualification if the delegate is satisfied that the individual has contravened the SIS Act in a manner that warrants such action due to the nature, seriousness, and number of the contraventions.
The SIS Act imposes several obligations on trustees and responsible officers, including adherence to the Act's provisions and maintaining high standards of conduct. Trustees and responsible officers must ensure compliance with all legal requirements, including those related to the management and investment of superannuation funds. They are also required to act in the best interests of the fund's members, which includes prudent management and transparent reporting. The disqualification of Mr Etheridge highlights the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of these obligations.
Breaches of the SIS Act can lead to significant consequences. Under the Act, contravening its provisions can result in penalties, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. For example, individuals found guilty of serious breaches may face fines of up to $210,000 and imprisonment for up to five years (section 1312). Additionally, the disqualification itself is a serious penalty, potentially barring the individual from future involvement in the superannuation industry. This disqualification order for Mr Etheridge is effective immediately upon the notice's issuance on 25 March 2015. Furthermore, the disqualification details will be published in the Gazette as per section 126A(7), serving as a public record of the decision and its implications.