NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr David Bennett
GREENSBOROUGH VIC 3088
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being, or acting as:
a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and number of contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 22 September 2014
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Grivell
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for better regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry, ensuring the protection of superannuation benefits for members. The Act was introduced to fill the gap by providing a regulatory framework to oversee trustees, investment managers, custodians, and other related entities within the superannuation sector. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity, efficiency, and stability of the superannuation system, safeguarding the interests of members by imposing strict compliance requirements on those involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds. The SISA empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry if they are found to have contravened the Act. This disqualification process is intended to deter non-compliance and ensure that those managing superannuation funds adhere to the highest standards of conduct and accountability.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation funds within Australia. Specifically, it governs trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of bodies corporate that are engaged in these roles within the superannuation industry. The Act’s jurisdiction is national, extending across all states and territories in Australia, ensuring uniform regulation of superannuation practices. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who contravene its requirements, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued to Mr. David Bennett for his breaches. This notice, issued under the authority of a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, highlights the seriousness of non-compliance and the potential consequences, including the immediate effect of the disqualification. The Act may also extend its application through subordinate instruments, which can further detail specific regulations and enforcement mechanisms.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Mr David Bennett that he has been disqualified from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that performs any of these roles (sections 126A(1) and 126A(6)). The decision to disqualify Mr Bennett stems from the delegate's satisfaction that he has contravened the SISA on multiple occasions, and the seriousness of these breaches justifies the disqualification. This disqualification order is effective immediately from the date of the notice, which in this case is 22 September 2014.
Under the SISA, the obligations imposed on parties such as Mr Bennett include adherence to the Act's provisions governing the management and administration of superannuation entities. These obligations are designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and ensure the proper conduct of those involved in the superannuation industry. For instance, trustees and responsible officers must act with the utmost good faith and diligence, ensuring the prudent management of the funds entrusted to them. They are also required to maintain accurate records, provide timely and accurate information to members, and comply with all relevant reporting and disclosure obligations.
Failure to meet these obligations can result in serious consequences, including disqualification from holding certain positions within the superannuation industry. The SISA provides for both civil and criminal penalties for breaches of its provisions. Civil penalties can include fines, while criminal penalties may result in imprisonment, depending on the nature and severity of the offence. In the case of disqualification under section 126A, the specific penalty is the loss of eligibility to act in the specified capacities within the superannuation industry, as outlined in the notice.
Moreover, the Act allows for the disqualification order to be revoked under certain conditions. For instance, the delegate may revoke the disqualification on their own initiative or in response to a written application from the disqualified person (subsection 126A(5)). Additionally, any person who is affected by the decision and is dissatisfied with it may request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision (section 344). This request must be made in writing and include the reasons for the reconsideration.