NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Brendan Green
COOGEE NSW 2034
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 03 December 2015
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Gerard Carney
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry, ensuring that superannuation entities operate in the best interests of their members. This Act was introduced to fill a gap in regulatory oversight, particularly to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers act with integrity and competence. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the stability and integrity of the superannuation system, which is crucial for the long-term financial security of Australians. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals who have failed to meet the required standards of conduct, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued under the Act to Mr. Brendan Green.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is an Australian Commonwealth Act that applies to various entities within the superannuation industry, including trustees, responsible officers, and other relevant persons. Specifically, the Act targets responsible officers who are found to have allowed or caused a corporate trustee to contravene the SISA, leading to disqualification. This Act extends its jurisdiction nationally across Australia, covering both corporate trustees and individuals who hold positions of responsibility within these entities. The geographic reach of the Act is therefore not limited to a specific state or territory but rather encompasses the entire country. The Act’s application is broad, covering any contravention of its provisions by corporate trustees or responsible officers, regardless of the nature or scale of the contraventions, provided they meet the specified criteria of seriousness and frequency. Notably, the Act can extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments, allowing for detailed regulations and guidelines that further define the scope and enforcement mechanisms. Exclusions or exemptions are limited and typically apply to specific conditions or circumstances outlined within the Act or its subsidiary legislation.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions for disqualifying responsible officers of corporate trustees who have been involved in multiple or serious breaches of the Act (sections 126A(2) and 126A(6)). In this case, Mr Brendan Green has been disqualified under these provisions by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. This disqualification arises from Mr Green's role as a responsible officer of the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities, where it is established that these entities contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the nature of these contraventions is such that they warrant his disqualification.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs, including corporate trustees and responsible officers. Corporate trustees are expected to comply with all provisions of the SISA, which cover a wide range of areas such as financial management, governance, and disclosure requirements. Responsible officers, such as Mr Green, have the additional duty of ensuring that their entities adhere to these obligations and must act diligently in preventing and addressing any contraventions. Their responsibilities include monitoring compliance, reporting breaches, and implementing corrective measures.
In cases where these obligations are not met, the SISA provides for a range of offences and penalties. Disqualification is one such measure, as seen in Mr Green's case. Additionally, the SISA allows for financial penalties, including substantial fines, as well as criminal charges that can lead to imprisonment. The specific penalties depend on the nature and severity of the contraventions. For example, serious or repeated breaches can result in penalties that may extend to five times the value of the benefit obtained or caused by the contravention, or in some cases, up to 10% of the entity’s total revenue for each day of the contravention.
Moreover, the Act provides mechanisms for the review of disqualification decisions. Mr Green, as the affected party, has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, as stipulated in section 344 of the SISA. This request must be made in writing and should detail the reasons for dissatisfaction with the initial decision. If the Commissioner agrees to reconsider the decision, they may either uphold or revoke the disqualification, depending on the merits of the case. Furthermore, the details of the disqualification are required to be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, as mandated by subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, ensuring transparency and public awareness of such actions.