NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
MR BERNARD HOCK
CASTLE HILL QLD 4811
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 9 September 2015
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Grivell
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to regulate the supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring proper management and administration of funds. The Act was introduced to address issues and gaps related to the management and oversight of superannuation funds, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers are fit and proper persons. Enacted by the Australian Parliament, the policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity of the superannuation system by imposing stringent requirements on trustees and responsible officers. In accordance with the Act, individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation entities can be disqualified, with such decisions being subject to review and appeal processes to ensure fairness and due process. This legislative framework is designed to uphold the trust placed in superannuation fund administrators and trustees by safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to trustees, responsible officers, and entities involved in the management of superannuation funds, extending its reach across the Commonwealth of Australia. Specifically, it governs the conduct of individuals and corporate bodies that are trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with stringent standards of fitness and propriety. The Act provides for the disqualification of persons deemed unfit to manage such funds, as illustrated by the notice issued to Mr. Bernard Hockcastle, reflecting the Act's intent to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members. The jurisdictional scope of the Act is national, with its provisions uniformly applicable across all states and territories, and it may be further extended or specified through subordinate instruments issued under the authority of the Act. However, the Act does not specify particular exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the primary text, with more detailed criteria likely to be found in regulations or guidelines issued under its authority.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a crucial piece of legislation designed to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia. Section 126A(6) of the Act mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must provide a notice of disqualification to any individual deemed unfit to serve as a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee of a superannuation entity. In this case, Mr Bernard Hockcastle Hill has been issued such a notice by Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, as per section 126A(3) of the SISA. The notice asserts that Mr Hill is not considered a fit and proper person to hold these positions due to reasons that are not specified in the notice itself, but are presumably related to concerns about his suitability or conduct.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on individuals like Mr Hill are stringent. As trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities, these individuals are expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity, competence, and fiduciary duty. They must ensure that the superannuation funds are managed ethically and in the best interests of the beneficiaries. By disqualifying Mr Hill, the Act underscores the importance of these standards and the consequences of failing to meet them. The disqualification is immediate, with the effect taking place on the day the notice is issued, as stipulated in the notice itself.
The Act also outlines potential penalties and consequences for breaches of its provisions. While the notice does not detail specific offences or penalties in this instance, the SISA generally provides for both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties can include fines up to a significant amount, often indexed for inflation, and in some cases, compensation orders. Criminal penalties may involve imprisonment, reflecting the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of trust and misconduct in the superannuation industry. Furthermore, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualification notices under certain conditions, as outlined in section 126A(5) of the SISA, and provides avenues for appeal and reconsideration if the affected party is dissatisfied with the decision, as mentioned in section 344 of the SISA.