NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Miss Tracy Shelverton
DAWESVILLE WA 6211
I, Ivan Parrrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 12 September 2013
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Per
Theo Saltis
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted to address the need for better oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers act in the best interests of superannuation fund members. The SIS Act was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, aiming to safeguard the retirement savings of Australians by imposing regulatory standards and penalties for non-compliance. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals from acting as trustees or responsible officers if they are found to have contravened the Act's provisions. This power is exercised to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, protecting members from potential mismanagement or misconduct. The policy objective of the SIS Act is to foster trust and confidence in the superannuation industry, ensuring that retirement funds are managed responsibly and that members' interests are prioritised.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, the Act targets trustees, responsible officers, and other key personnel within superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards and protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act's jurisdictional reach is national, encompassing all Australian states and territories, thereby establishing a uniform regulatory framework across the country. The disqualification provisions, such as those referenced in the notice to Miss Tracy Shelverton, allow for the removal of individuals from their roles if they are found to have contravened the Act, based on the severity and frequency of the violations. The Act also provides mechanisms for the revocation of disqualification orders and avenues for reconsideration by the Commissioner of Taxation, ensuring that affected individuals have opportunities to contest decisions. Subordinate instruments may further extend or detail the application of the Act, thereby allowing for more specific regulatory measures as needed.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) includes a mechanism to protect the integrity of the superannuation industry. Under subsection 126A(6) of the SIS Act, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify an individual from being a trustee or responsible officer of certain entities. The operative section here is 126A(6), which allows for such a decision to be made if the delegate is satisfied that the individual has contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions. The disqualification is deemed necessary due to the nature, seriousness, and number of these contraventions, as per subsection 126A(1).
The obligations imposed on the parties governed by the SIS Act include adherence to the provisions set out in the Act. This means that trustees and responsible officers must ensure they are not contravening any provisions of the Act. For those who are disqualified, the primary obligation is to refrain from acting in any capacity that involves the management or administration of superannuation entities. The notice provided to Miss Tracy Shelverton is an example of the formal communication required under the SIS Act when a decision to disqualify is made. It is important for those affected to understand the implications of such a decision and the specific restrictions it imposes.
The SIS Act also outlines the consequences for non-compliance. For instance, any individual who continues to act in a capacity for which they have been disqualified can face legal penalties. Under the Act, the severity of the penalties can vary depending on the nature and frequency of the contraventions. Although specific penalties are not detailed in the provided excerpt, it is clear that breach of the Act can lead to significant civil or criminal consequences. Furthermore, there is a provision for the disqualification order to be revoked under subsection 126A(5) if the Commissioner decides to do so on their own initiative or upon written application from the affected individual. There is also a right to request reconsideration of the decision within 21 days, as stipulated in section 344 of the SIS Act, allowing for a formal process to contest the disqualification if the individual believes the decision was unjust.