NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Michele Graham
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Michele Graham
SUBIACO PO WA 6904
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 23 February 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Nichola Wood-Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring the protection of superannuation fund members. This Act provides the legal framework for the oversight and management of superannuation entities, aiming to safeguard the financial interests and retirement benefits of participants. The SISA is administered by the Commonwealth Government, and its policy objectives include maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, protecting members’ retirement savings, and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. In the case of Michele Graham, the Act was applied to disqualify her from acting as a trustee due to serious contraventions of the legislation, reflecting the Act’s role in enforcing accountability and maintaining high standards within the superannuation sector.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities, as well as to the entities themselves, across the Commonwealth of Australia. This legislation governs the conduct of these individuals and entities, ensuring compliance with standards designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act’s jurisdiction extends nationally, covering all superannuation entities operating within Australia, regardless of state or territory. The Act includes provisions for disqualification of individuals found to have seriously contravened its requirements, as demonstrated in the disqualification notice issued to Michele Graham. This notice indicates that Michele has been disqualified from acting in a supervisory capacity within the superannuation industry due to the seriousness of contraventions that occurred while she was a trustee. The disqualification is effective immediately and is subject to potential revocation under specific conditions. Additionally, the Act provides for the publication of such disqualification notices and imposes criminal penalties for those who knowingly act in a prohibited capacity post-disqualification.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals who have acted as trustees of superannuation entities and have contravened the Act. Section 126A(1) empowers a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person from being a trustee of a superannuation entity if certain conditions are met. In this instance, Michele Graham has been disqualified under subsection 126A(6) due to the trustee of one or more superannuation entities contravening the SISA while she was a trustee, and the seriousness of these contraventions justifies her disqualification. The disqualification becomes effective on the day the notice is issued.
The SISA imposes several obligations on trustees of superannuation entities. Trustees must adhere to various standards of conduct and financial management as outlined in the Act. They must ensure that the superannuation funds are managed prudently and in the best interests of the members. Trustees also have a duty to ensure compliance with the Act and to report any breaches to the relevant authorities. These responsibilities are critical to maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system.
Failure to comply with the SISA can result in severe consequences. Section 126K of the Act criminalises the act of a disqualified person knowingly being or acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. A person found guilty of this offence faces a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. Additionally, Michele Graham has the option to seek a revocation of her disqualification under subsection 126A(5), either through her own application or at the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation.
For those affected by the disqualification decision, there is a mechanism for reconsideration. Section 344 of the SISA allows Michele Graham to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and must detail the reasons why she believes the decision is incorrect. This provides a safeguard for individuals who feel that their disqualification may have been unjust or based on erroneous information.