NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Michael Rodriguez
HILLARYS WA 6025
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 2 December 2013
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
per Wendy Heatley
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted to establish a robust regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation entities, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. This legislation was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight in the superannuation industry to prevent misconduct and ensure the financial stability of superannuation funds. The enactment of the SIS Act was authorised by the Parliament of Australia to ensure that trustees and responsible officers act with integrity and competence. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the superannuation savings of Australians by enforcing high standards of conduct and accountability within the industry. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from holding positions of trust or responsibility within superannuation entities if they have contravened the Act, thereby protecting fund members from potential harm caused by misconduct.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to trustees, responsible officers, and bodies corporate that act as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities in Australia. This legislation extends its reach across the Commonwealth and encompasses various conduct and transactions relating to the management and oversight of superannuation funds. The disqualification order issued under this Act applies to Michael Rodriguez, a resident of Hillarys, Western Australia, with the decision to disqualify him from holding a position as a trustee or a responsible officer within a superannuation entity taking effect immediately upon the notice issuance. The grounds for this disqualification are based on multiple contraventions of the SIS Act, deemed serious enough to warrant such action. The Act also allows for the potential revocation of the disqualification order, either on the initiative of the authorities or upon a written application by the disqualified individual, along with the provision for reconsideration by the Commissioner within a specified timeframe.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) includes specific provisions for disqualifying individuals from acting as trustees or responsible officers of entities managing superannuation funds. In this case, under subsection 126A(6) of the SIS Act, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, Ivan Parrett, has issued a notice disqualifying Michael Rodriguez from such roles. This disqualification arises from the delegate's satisfaction that Rodriguez has contravened the SIS Act on multiple occasions, with the seriousness and frequency of the breaches warranting such action. The disqualification order becomes effective on the date of the notice, which in this instance is 2 December 2013. The delegate’s decision to disqualify Rodriguez is based on the understanding that the nature of the contraventions provides sufficient grounds for this measure.
Under the SIS Act, the delegate’s decision imposes specific obligations on Rodriguez, prohibiting him from serving as a trustee or responsible officer of any body corporate involved in the management of superannuation entities, such as trustees, investment managers, or custodians. This prohibition is intended to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that individuals with a history of non-compliance do not continue to manage or influence superannuation funds. Rodriguez’s disqualification means he must refrain from engaging in any activities that require his role as a trustee or responsible officer, and any entity he is involved with must appoint a replacement to ensure compliance with the SIS Act.
The SIS Act also outlines potential consequences for non-compliance with its provisions. If Rodriguez or any other disqualified individual continues to act in a capacity that the disqualification order prohibits, they could face legal penalties. Under subsection 126A(7), particulars of the disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette, ensuring public awareness of the decision. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) allows for the possibility of the disqualification order being revoked, either on the delegate’s initiative or through a written application by the disqualified individual. Lastly, section 344 of the SIS Act provides a mechanism for challenging the decision, allowing Rodriguez to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided he submits a written request detailing the reasons for his dissatisfaction with the decision.