NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Michael Nelder Greenslade
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
MICHAEL NELDER GREENSLADE
EDEN HILLS SA 5050
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 23 May 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jenny McGuire
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to establish a framework for the regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing issues related to the management and investment of superannuation funds. This Act was introduced to ensure that trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities adhere to specific standards and regulations to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The enactment of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was overseen by the Parliament of Australia, with the aim of promoting the efficient, honest, and economical management of superannuation funds. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity of the superannuation system by imposing strict regulatory requirements on industry participants and by providing for the disqualification of individuals who fail to comply with these requirements. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who contravene the provisions of the Act, thereby preventing them from participating in the administration of superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation funds in Australia. The Act's jurisdiction extends nationally, affecting trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities across the Commonwealth. The Act seeks to ensure the integrity and proper administration of superannuation funds by disqualifying individuals who contravene its provisions, as evidenced by the disqualification of Michael Nelder Greenslade. This disqualification applies immediately upon notice and prohibits the disqualified individual from acting in any capacity involving the management of superannuation entities, with serious penalties for non-compliance, including potential imprisonment. The Act also provides mechanisms for review and potential revocation of disqualification through the Commissioner of Taxation.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to the notice of disqualification provided to Michael Nelder Greenslade include subsection 126A(1), which permits the disqualification of a person for contraventions of the Act, and subsection 126A(6), which requires the Commissioner of Taxation to provide a written notice of disqualification. Section 126A(7) mandates the publication of the disqualification notice in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice, as per subsection 126A(6).
Michael Nelder Greenslade, having been disqualified under the Act, faces stringent obligations and requirements. Notably, section 126K of the SISA imposes an offence on disqualified individuals who knowingly act as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, or as responsible officers of such entities. This means Michael Nelder Greenslade is prohibited from engaging in any activities that involve the management or administration of superannuation funds until his disqualification is revoked. Failure to comply with these provisions can lead to severe legal consequences.
Breaching the provisions outlined in the SISA can lead to significant penalties. Under section 126K, the maximum penalty for knowingly acting in a capacity prohibited by the Act is two years imprisonment. This underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance and highlights the potential criminal consequences for individuals who disregard their disqualification. Additionally, the notice under section 126A(5) indicates that the disqualification can be revoked either by the Commissioner on their own initiative or upon a written application by Michael Nelder Greenslade. However, this does not mitigate the immediate effect of the disqualification and the stringent requirements it imposes.
Should Michael Nelder Greenslade be dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, he has recourse under section 344 of the SISA. This section allows for a reconsideration request to be made in writing to the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must detail the reasons for believing the decision to be incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a formal process in place for reviewing and potentially overturning a disqualification decision, providing a degree of procedural fairness and due process.