To:
Michael Lee Craig
Drysdale VIC 3222
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 1 August 2017
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Colleen Shelton
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that funds are managed responsibly and in the best interests of members. This Act provides the legislative framework for the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to oversee and enforce compliance within the superannuation sector, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and beneficiaries. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain and enhance the financial stability of the superannuation system, ensuring that superannuation entities operate within a robust regulatory environment that safeguards member interests. The SISA empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry if they are found to have contravened the Act, as illustrated by the disqualification notice issued under the authority of the Act. This legislative measure serves to uphold the integrity and reliability of the superannuation industry by preventing individuals who have demonstrated serious breaches of the Act from continuing to manage superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry within Australia. This includes trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities, as well as bodies corporate that act in these roles. The Act's jurisdiction extends nationally across Australia, covering both Commonwealth and state levels. Exclusions or exemptions within the Act are minimal, as its primary purpose is to ensure the integrity and compliance of superannuation entities and their officers. The application of the Act may also be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or codes of practice, which provide further detail on specific aspects of the legislation. The Act imposes stringent penalties for contraventions, including the possibility of disqualification and imprisonment for those found to be in breach of its provisions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines specific provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act, as seen in subsection 126A(1) and 126A(6). This disqualification process, initiated by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, serves as a formal notice that an individual is barred from participating in roles such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, as well as from acting as a responsible officer or being part of a body corporate that assumes such roles. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance, as indicated in the notice dated 1 August 2017.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Firstly, it mandates that any disqualified individual refrain from engaging in the prohibited activities mentioned above. This requirement is reinforced by section 126K, which stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue in any of these roles, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. These obligations are critical in ensuring compliance and maintaining the integrity of the superannuation industry.
Failure to comply with these obligations can result in severe consequences. Under section 126K, a disqualified person who knowingly continues to act in a prohibited capacity can be charged with an offence. The potential penalty for such an offence is significant, with a maximum sentence of two years in jail. This serves as a deterrent against non-compliance and underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of its provisions.
In addition to the immediate disqualification and potential criminal penalties, the Act provides avenues for reconsideration and potential revocation of the disqualification. Subsection 126A(5) allows for the revocation of the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. This offers a pathway for those who believe their disqualification is unjust or unwarranted. Furthermore, section 344 allows for a request to the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the disqualification notice, provided the request is made in writing and includes the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision. These provisions ensure that there is a formal process in place for reviewing and potentially overturning the disqualification, thereby maintaining a balance between enforcement and due process.