NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Michael Bishopp
SOUTHPORT QLD 4215
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature, seriousness, number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 2 July 2015
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Robert Moon
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for the regulation and oversight of superannuation entities in Australia, ensuring that these entities are managed in the best interests of their members. The SISA was introduced to create a robust framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the financial wellbeing of superannuation fund members. The Act was enacted by the Australian Parliament, reflecting the policy objective of providing comprehensive regulation to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. The Act includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals from managing superannuation entities if they have engaged in conduct that breaches the Act's requirements, as a means of safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities, imposing obligations and standards to ensure the proper management and regulation of superannuation funds within Australia. The Act primarily targets individuals who hold positions of significant responsibility within corporate trustees, such as directors or senior managers, ensuring they adhere to the stringent requirements designed to protect fund members. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across all states and territories of Australia, thereby maintaining uniform standards for superannuation fund management. The Act provides for disqualification of responsible officers if certain breaches occur, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued to Michael Bishopp, which is applicable from the date of issuance. Subordinate instruments may extend or clarify the application of the Act, but the primary legislation sets out the fundamental framework and obligations for those within its scope. Notably, the Act does not specify exclusions or thresholds in its primary provisions, but subordinate legislation or specific guidelines may further detail conditions or exceptions relevant to particular circumstances or entities.
Key Provisions
The key provision of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to this notice of disqualification is section 126A, which allows for the disqualification of responsible officers of corporate trustees in certain circumstances. Under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, an individual can be disqualified if they were a responsible officer at the time the corporate trustee contravened the SISA in a manner that is serious enough to warrant such action. The notice to Michael Bishopp (subsection 126A(6)) informs him that he has been disqualified under these provisions because the corporate trustee for which he was a responsible officer has contravened the SISA multiple times in a manner that justifies his disqualification.
The obligations imposed on parties governed by the SISA include adherence to the statutory requirements that govern the management and operation of superannuation entities. Responsible officers must ensure that the corporate trustees they serve comply with all relevant provisions of the SISA. This includes, but is not limited to, maintaining proper records, ensuring the prudent management of superannuation funds, and reporting any breaches of the SISA to the relevant authorities. Failure to meet these obligations can lead to disqualification, as seen in Michael Bishopp's case.
Under the SISA, various offences can lead to disqualification, and the penalties for such breaches can be severe. While specific penalties are not detailed in the notice, the Act allows for both civil and criminal penalties depending on the nature and seriousness of the contraventions. The civil penalties can include substantial fines, and in criminal cases, imprisonment may be imposed. The exact penalties are determined by the courts, taking into account the severity of the offence and any previous convictions. It is also noteworthy that the disqualification itself has significant professional and personal consequences for the individual, potentially barring them from managing superannuation entities in the future.
In summary, the notice of disqualification to Michael Bishopp highlights the serious implications of failing to comply with the SISA as a responsible officer. The Act's provisions under section 126A allow for the disqualification of individuals found to be responsible for significant contraventions by the corporate trustees they serve. The obligations on responsible officers to ensure compliance with the SISA are stringent, and the potential penalties for non-compliance are considerable, encompassing both financial and professional ramifications.