Notice of Disqualification– Melissa Waaka-Smith - 15 November 2023
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Melissa Waaka-Smith
Rotorua 3015 New Zealand
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 15 November 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pamela Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by establishing a regulatory framework for the superannuation industry. This Act was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of entities managing superannuation funds to prevent misconduct and ensure compliance with the law. The SISA is administered by the Parliament of Australia, with the aim of maintaining public confidence in the superannuation system by enforcing accountability and penalising breaches of the law. The policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the financial interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians act in accordance with their fiduciary duties and regulatory obligations.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and operation of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards and safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members. Specifically, the Act imposes responsibilities on responsible officers, trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, and it extends its reach to the entire Commonwealth of Australia. The Act can disqualify individuals from performing certain roles within superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened its provisions. The geographic scope of the Act is national, applying uniformly across all states and territories in Australia. The disqualification process, as demonstrated in the notice to Melissa Waaka-Smith, can be initiated by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation and becomes effective immediately upon issuance. Furthermore, the Act provides for the publication of such disqualification notices as Notifiable Instruments in the Federal Register of Legislation, thereby ensuring transparency and accountability. The Act also includes provisions for the revocation of disqualifications and allows for judicial review by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied with the decision.
Key Provisions
The notice issued under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Melissa Waaka-Smith that she has been disqualified as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee involved with one or more superannuation entities. This disqualification was made due to the serious nature of the contraventions committed by the corporate trustee, for which Melissa was held accountable at the time of the breaches. Under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, the disqualification takes immediate effect on the day it is issued.
In accordance with the Act, Melissa, now disqualified, faces stringent obligations and requirements. As per section 126K of the SISA, Melissa is prohibited from acting or being a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or serving as a responsible officer or body corporate associated with such roles. This prohibition extends to any entity that functions as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. Failure to comply with these restrictions can result in serious legal consequences.
The SISA imposes severe penalties for violations of these provisions. As noted in Note 2, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who is aware of their disqualification, to engage in activities prohibited by section 126K. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act treats such breaches. This underscores the importance of compliance with the disqualification order and the legal ramifications of non-compliance.
Additionally, under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon Melissa's written application. This provides a potential avenue for Melissa to seek reinstatement under certain conditions. Furthermore, under section 344 of the SISA, Melissa has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision if she believes it to be incorrect. Any such request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice, clearly outlining the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision.