NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Matthew King
SPRINGWOOD QLD 4127
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 10 April 2017
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per William Keating
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure the effective and prudent supervision of superannuation entities, aiming to safeguard the interests of members and beneficiaries. The Act addresses the gap in regulation concerning the management and oversight of superannuation funds, which are critical to the retirement savings of many Australians. The Australian Parliament introduced the Act to establish a robust framework for the governance of superannuation funds, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers meet specific standards of competence and integrity. The policy objective of the SISA is to protect the financial well-being of superannuation members by enforcing stringent standards on those who manage these funds. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds, as illustrated in the disqualification notice to Matthew King.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds, including trustees, responsible officers, and investment managers of superannuation entities. This Act operates at a Commonwealth level and regulates the superannuation industry to ensure the proper administration and protection of funds for retirement savings. The Act's scope extends to disqualifying individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation entities based on various criteria, such as criminal conduct, breaches of trust, or other disqualifying actions. Notably, the Act includes specific provisions for the disqualification of individuals who are not fit and proper persons to act as trustees or responsible officers, with the disqualification taking immediate effect upon issuance. Additionally, the Act outlines penalties for those who continue to act in a disqualified capacity, including potential imprisonment. The Act also provides avenues for reconsideration and revocation of disqualification notices, ensuring a balanced approach to the enforcement of its provisions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides for the disqualification of individuals deemed unfit to act as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities. Under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, such as James O'Halloran in this case, can issue a notice of disqualification. This notice, as evidenced in the provided gazette, informs Matthew King that he has been disqualified from holding such positions because it is believed that he is not a fit and proper person. The disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice.
The SISA imposes certain obligations on parties and entities it governs, including the requirement for trustees and responsible officers to meet certain fitness standards. Section 126K of the SISA further stipulates that disqualified individuals must not act as trustees, investment managers, custodians, or responsible officers of superannuation entities. These roles are critical in managing the investments and financial affairs of superannuation funds, and the Act ensures that only those deemed fit and proper are entrusted with these responsibilities.
Failure to comply with these provisions results in significant legal consequences. According to section 126K of the SISA, knowingly acting in any of the prohibited roles after being disqualified is an offence. The maximum penalty for this offence is a two-year jail term. This stringent penalty underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of its provisions, particularly those that could potentially harm the interests of superannuation fund members.
Additionally, the Act provides for the possibility of revocation of disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner's delegate or upon the written application of the disqualified individual. This provision offers a pathway for reinstatement if the disqualified individual can demonstrate that they are now fit and proper to hold such roles. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA allows for reconsideration of the decision if the affected party is dissatisfied. Any request for reconsideration must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must include the reasons for dissatisfaction.