NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Matthew Jones
JOYNER QLD 4500
I, JAMES O’HALLORAN, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 10 January 2020
JAMES O’HALLORAN
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and beneficiaries. This Act addresses the problem of ensuring compliance and accountability within the superannuation sector, specifically targeting the conduct of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The Act was passed by the Australian Parliament with the policy objective of maintaining the integrity and reliability of the superannuation system. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act. The disqualification serves as a deterrent against misconduct and ensures that only those who adhere to the standards set by the Act can manage superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees managing superannuation entities in Australia. This includes individuals and corporate bodies involved in the oversight and management of superannuation funds. The Act extends its reach across the Commonwealth, ensuring uniform regulation and supervision of superannuation trustees and their officers nationwide. The Act's disqualification provisions, such as those under subsection 126A, empower the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the Act. This disqualification can be initiated when the responsible officer was involved in the contraventions and the seriousness of the breaches justifies such action. The disqualification is effective immediately upon notice and may be subject to revocation under certain conditions, as outlined in subsection 126A(5). Furthermore, any disqualified person found to contravene the provisions under section 126K faces potential criminal penalties, including up to two years imprisonment. Individuals affected by such decisions have the right to request reconsideration from the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides several key sections that govern the disqualification of responsible officers within superannuation entities. Section 126A(2) outlines the criteria for disqualification, which in this case, has been applied to Matthew Jones due to his role as a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions by the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities. Section 126A(6) mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must provide a formal notice of disqualification, which has been duly issued to Matthew Jones. This notice not only informs him of his disqualification but also specifies that it takes effect on the day it is made.
Under the SISA, responsible officers are subject to certain obligations to ensure compliance with the Act's requirements. These obligations include adhering to the standards set forth by the SISA, which cover various aspects of superannuation fund management, such as investment strategies, trustee duties, and financial reporting. When a responsible officer is found to have failed in their duty by allowing contraventions to occur, the Act permits the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify them from performing such roles in the future. This serves as a deterrent to non-compliance and helps maintain the integrity of the superannuation system.
The Act imposes significant consequences for breaches of its provisions. Section 126K stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate fulfilling these roles. This offence carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness with which the SISA treats non-compliance. Additionally, the disqualification notice is published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, as per subsection 126A(7), which serves to inform the public of the disqualification and the reasons behind it.
For Matthew Jones, this disqualification presents both immediate and potential future implications. While the disqualification is currently in effect, he has the right to request reconsideration of the decision under section 344 of the SISA. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should detail the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) allows for the revocation of the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application from Matthew Jones. This provision offers a pathway for reinstatement should he successfully demonstrate that the grounds for disqualification no longer apply.