NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - MATTHEW FENECH
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Matthew Fenech
HORSLEY NSW 2530
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contravention you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 1 November 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Armides Morales
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was introduced to address issues and gaps in the regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers act in accordance with the law and industry standards. The enacting body for the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 is the Commonwealth Parliament. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry by establishing a robust regulatory framework that safeguards the financial well-being of superannuation fund members. The Act provides for the regulation of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, and establishes a system of disqualification and penalties for those who fail to comply with their obligations. The disqualification of Matthew Fenech under subsection 126A(2) of the Act is a demonstration of the enforcement of these objectives to ensure compliance with the law and maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and supervision of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate trustees. The Act operates at the Commonwealth level, governing conduct and transactions across Australia, ensuring compliance with superannuation laws and the protection of superannuation fund members' interests. The Act imposes disqualifications on individuals who, as responsible officers, are associated with corporate trustees that have breached SISA provisions, with the seriousness of the contravention being a determining factor. This notice specifically addresses Matthew Fenech, whose disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance. The Act also provides for the publication of such disqualifications in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette and stipulates penalties for disqualified persons who continue to act in prohibited capacities. Additionally, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualifications under certain conditions and provides a process for reconsideration of the disqualification decision.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have been associated with corporate trustees that have contravened the Act. Specifically, under subsection 126A(2), a person can be disqualified if the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA and the person was a responsible officer at the time of the contravention. This disqualification is intended to address serious breaches of the Act that warrant the removal of certain individuals from their roles in superannuation entities.
Matthew Fenech has been disqualified under this section because the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation is satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA and Matthew was a responsible officer at the time. The seriousness of the contravention has provided grounds for his disqualification. This disqualification, as stated under subsection 126A(6), is effective from the date it is made. It is also noteworthy that under subsection 126A(7), details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette to inform the public.
Individuals who are disqualified under the SISA face significant obligations and restrictions. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment. This stringent measure ensures that individuals who have been found to have acted in a way that warrants their disqualification are prevented from continuing to manage or influence superannuation entities.
In addition to the criminal penalties, Matthew Fenech can apply for the revocation of his disqualification under subsection 126A(5). This can be initiated by the delegate on their own initiative or in response to a written application from Matthew. If Matthew is not satisfied with the decision to disqualify him, he has the right to request a reconsideration from the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification. This request must be made in writing and should outline the reasons why he believes the decision is incorrect. This process provides a formal avenue for appeal and ensures that the decision is reviewed under the framework established by the Act.