NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Matthew Bradley – 21 November 2023
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Matthew Bradley
YOWIE BAY NSW 2228
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 21 November 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Karen Taylor
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to provide for the regulation of the superannuation industry, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and the rights of members. This legislation was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of superannuation entities to prevent misconduct and financial mismanagement, thereby safeguarding the interests of superannuation members. The Act was enacted by the Parliament of Australia, with the policy objective of maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. The Act aims to ensure that trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities adhere to high standards of conduct and compliance, protecting the retirement savings of Australians.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees managing superannuation entities, imposing obligations and standards to ensure the proper administration of superannuation funds. The disqualification notice under this Act targets individuals such as Matthew Bradley who have contravened the Act while serving as a responsible officer, leading to their disqualification from holding such positions. The jurisdictional reach of this Act is national, applying across Australia, and includes provisions for the publication of disqualification notices as Notifiable Instruments in the Federal Register of Legislation. While the Act does not specify particular exclusions or thresholds, it does provide mechanisms for the revocation of disqualification and avenues for reconsideration by the Commissioner of Taxation, ensuring procedural fairness and the possibility of rectification for those affected.
Key Provisions
The main sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) that are pertinent to this disqualification notice are subsections 126A(2) and 126A(6). Under subsection 126A(2), the Commissioner of Taxation is empowered to disqualify an individual from performing certain roles related to superannuation entities if the Commissioner is satisfied that the individual has contravened the SISA and the seriousness of the contravention warrants such action. Subsection 126A(6) mandates that the Commissioner must give notice of any such disqualification to the affected individual. In this case, Matthew Bradley has been disqualified from performing roles such as trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity, or being a responsible officer of a body corporate that performs these roles.
The obligations imposed on Matthew Bradley under this Act are significant. As a former responsible officer of a corporate trustee that has contravened the SISA, Matthew Bradley is now disqualified from participating in any capacity with superannuation entities. This means he cannot act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian, nor can he be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds any of these roles. The seriousness of the contraventions leading to the disqualification underscores the importance of compliance with SISA regulations, which are designed to protect superannuation funds and beneficiaries.
Breaching the terms of this disqualification can lead to serious consequences. Section 126K of the SISA stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification status to be or act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The penalty for committing this offence is severe, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty reflects the gravity of the offence and the necessity to uphold the integrity of the superannuation system.
Matthew Bradley has the right to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision if he is dissatisfied with it. This request must be made in writing to the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification, and it must include the reasons why he believes the decision is incorrect. Additionally, there is a provision under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA that allows for the disqualification to be revoked either on the Commissioner's own initiative or upon a written application from Matthew Bradley himself. This provides a pathway for potential rectification if new evidence or circumstances come to light that could alter the original decision.