Notice Of Disqualification – Martin John Hall - 14 November 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Martin John Hall
EAST FREMANTLE WA 6158
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) and 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 14 November 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pam Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate and supervise the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. This Act addresses the need for stringent oversight to prevent misconduct and ensure the integrity of superannuation entities. The Australian Parliament introduced the SISA to establish a robust framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry, focusing on maintaining high standards of conduct among trustees, investment managers, and custodians to safeguard the retirement savings of Australians. The policy objective of the SISA is to ensure the financial security of superannuation fund members by enforcing strict regulatory measures and holding responsible officers accountable for any breaches of the Act. The recent disqualification of Martin John Hall under the SISA underscores the Act's commitment to these objectives by addressing serious contraventions that warrant such action.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate trustees. The Act has a national reach across Australia, impacting the entire superannuation industry. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who have contravened its provisions, as evidenced by the notice of disqualification issued to Martin John Hall. The disqualification applies to the individual personally and extends to any roles they held at the time of the contraventions, such as being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee. The Act also includes specific criminal offences for disqualified individuals who continue to act in their prohibited roles, with penalties that include imprisonment for up to two years. Additionally, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualifications and provides a process for individuals to request a reconsideration of the decision if they are dissatisfied with the outcome.
Key Provisions
The notice issued to Martin John Hall pursuant to subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) indicates that he has been disqualified from certain roles within the superannuation industry. Under subsection 126A(1) and 126A(2), the disqualification is a result of Hall's contraventions of the SISA, which are deemed serious enough to warrant such action. This disqualification also stems from his position as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities at the time of these contraventions. The disqualification is effective immediately upon the issuance of the notice.
The obligations imposed by the Act on Hall include refraining from acting or being involved in any capacity as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, as well as from being a responsible officer or a body corporate involved in such capacities. This prohibition is intended to prevent further breaches and to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry. Additionally, Hall is required to ensure that he does not knowingly contravene any provisions of the SISA in the future.
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity related to a superannuation entity. If Hall knowingly violates this prohibition, he faces serious consequences. The maximum penalty for this offence is imprisonment for up to two years. This serves as a deterrent to ensure compliance with the Act's provisions.
There are also procedural safeguards included in the SISA. For instance, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the authorities or upon a written application by Hall. This provides a mechanism for potential reinstatement if Hall can demonstrate that the grounds for disqualification no longer apply. Furthermore, under section 344 of the SISA, Hall has the right to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving notice, provided he submits a written request outlining the reasons he believes the decision is incorrect. This ensures that there is a formal process for challenging the decision if Hall believes it to be unjust.