NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Mark Williams - 20 November 2023
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mark Williams
THOONA VIC 3726
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 20 November 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Antonio Macolino
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address significant concerns regarding the regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry. The Act was introduced to fill a critical gap in the oversight of superannuation entities, ensuring that trustees and other responsible officers comply with stringent regulatory standards designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The overarching policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by enforcing rigorous standards of conduct and compliance among those who manage superannuation entities. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from acting as responsible officers of superannuation entities if there are serious breaches of the law, thereby safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to the superannuation industry, including entities such as trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, as well as individuals who hold positions of responsibility within these entities. The Act has a national jurisdictional reach, applying across Australia, and is enforced by the Commissioner of Taxation. It specifically targets responsible officers of corporate trustees who have been involved in contraventions of the Act. The disqualification of individuals such as Mark Williams under this Act is intended to safeguard the integrity and proper functioning of the superannuation industry by preventing those who have been involved in serious breaches from continuing to hold positions of trust or responsibility within the industry. The Act also provides mechanisms for the revocation of disqualifications and for the reconsideration of disqualification decisions by the Commissioner. Notably, the Act explicitly states that it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue to act in their former capacity, with potential penalties including imprisonment for up to two years.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to this notice of disqualification are subsections 126A(2) and 126A(6). According to subsection 126A(2), a responsible officer can be disqualified if the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA and the officer was in that position at the time of the contraventions. Subsection 126A(6) then mandates that the Commissioner of Taxation must give written notice of this disqualification to the individual concerned. The notice, in this case, informs Mark Williams that he has been disqualified from acting in certain capacities due to the aforementioned circumstances.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. A responsible officer of a corporate trustee must ensure compliance with the SISA, particularly in their role. If there is a contravention of the Act, the responsible officer may face disqualification if the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such a measure. Additionally, under section 126K, a disqualified person is prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or being a responsible officer or body corporate involved in such capacities. This ensures that individuals who have previously contravened the Act do not continue to manage superannuation entities.
The SISA also outlines the penalties and consequences for breaches. Section 126K imposes a criminal offence on a disqualified person who knowingly acts in a prohibited capacity. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act treats such contraventions. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) provides for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This flexibility allows for the possibility of reinstatement if certain conditions are met.
If Mark Williams is dissatisfied with the decision, he has the right to ask the Commissioner to reconsider it under section 344 of the SISA. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision and should detail the reasons why he believes the decision is incorrect. This provision ensures that affected individuals have a formal mechanism to challenge a decision they believe to be unjust or erroneous.