NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Mark Ohlsen
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mark Ohlsen
Wattle Park VIC 3128
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 5 July 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Karen Taylor
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to establish a regulatory framework governing the administration and oversight of superannuation funds in Australia. This Act was introduced to address the need for stringent governance and compliance within the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and ensure the proper administration of their funds. The Act was passed by the Australian Parliament, reflecting the Commonwealth Government's commitment to safeguarding the superannuation system. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain high standards of integrity and accountability within the superannuation industry, thereby fostering trust and confidence among participants.
In this context, the Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened its provisions, as demonstrated by the disqualification notice issued to Mark Ohlsen. The notice, dated 5 July 2023, was issued by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, pursuant to the Act's provisions. The disqualification stems from Mark Ohlsen's contraventions of the Act, which the delegate found to be serious enough to warrant this action. The disqualification prohibits Mark Ohlsen from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, with severe penalties for non-compliance, including up to two years in jail. Furthermore, the notice outlines provisions for the revocation of the disqualification and the process for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, encompassing trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act is of Commonwealth jurisdiction, thereby extending its reach across the entire nation, ensuring uniform regulation and oversight of the superannuation sector. The disqualification provisions under the Act, as evidenced by the notice issued to Mark Ohlsen, serve to prevent individuals who have contravened the Act from participating in any capacity within the superannuation industry. The disqualification is immediate upon issuance and includes a prohibition on acting in certain roles within superannuation entities, with severe penalties for non-compliance. Furthermore, the Act allows for the possibility of revocation of disqualification, either by the delegate or upon application by the disqualified person, and provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied with the outcome.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to this notice include subsections 126A(1) and 126A(6) (paragraph 1). These sections allow the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person from participating in the superannuation industry if they have contravened the SISA and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualification. The notice to Mark Ohlsen indicates that he has been disqualified under these provisions, as the delegate is satisfied that he has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice.
The Act imposes various obligations and requirements on the parties and entities it governs. For instance, it requires trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities to comply with the provisions of the SISA (subsection 126A(1)). If a person is disqualified under the Act, they are prohibited from acting or being in any capacity that involves the management of superannuation entities (section 126K). This includes being a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a body corporate that manages these entities. The Act aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that only fit and proper persons manage their funds.
There are significant consequences for breach of the Act's provisions. Section 126K outlines that it is an offence for a disqualified person to be, or act as, a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. If found guilty, the maximum penalty is two years imprisonment. This penalty underscores the seriousness with which the Act regards breaches of disqualification orders. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked by the delegate on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified person.
If Mark Ohlsen is affected by this decision and is not satisfied with it, he has the right to ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision (section 344). This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision and should include the reasons why he believes the decision is wrong. This provision ensures that there is a process in place for reviewing decisions that may have significant impacts on individuals' professional lives.