NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – MARGARET KEEFE
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
MARGARET KEEFE
MANLEY VIC 3076
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 22 July 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pamela Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure that superannuation funds are managed with integrity, accountability, and transparency. The Act was introduced to address the need for a robust regulatory framework to oversee the administration and investment of superannuation funds, protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. Enacted by the Parliament of Australia, the SISA aims to safeguard the financial well-being of Australians by establishing a comprehensive regulatory system that imposes obligations on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, and provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the power to disqualify individuals who do not adhere to these obligations. This disqualification mechanism serves as a deterrent against misconduct and promotes adherence to the high standards of governance and compliance required within the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and corporate trustees involved in the management and administration of superannuation entities within Australia. This Act is of Commonwealth jurisdiction, meaning it has a national reach and applies across all states and territories. The Act targets the conduct and transactions of responsible officers and trustees of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. In the specific case of Margaret Keefe, she has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA due to her role as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the Act. The disqualification is effective from the date of issuance and includes severe penalties for any subsequent contraventions, as outlined in section 126K of the Act, which can result in up to two years of imprisonment. The Commissioner of Taxation has the authority to revoke the disqualification under subsection 126A(5), either on their own initiative or upon a written application from the disqualified person. Furthermore, any aggrieved party can seek reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, as provided under section 344 of the SISA.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions that address the disqualification of individuals who are responsible officers of corporate trustees involved in the management of superannuation entities. Section 126A(2) of the SISA allows for the disqualification of individuals if the corporate trustee has contravened the Act and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies such action. Section 126A(6) requires the Commissioner of Taxation to give notice to the disqualified person, as seen in the Notice of Disqualification provided to Margaret Keefe. This notice informs the individual that they have been disqualified under the Act due to their role during the contraventions by the corporate trustee.
The Act imposes several obligations on parties and entities it governs. For example, responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure compliance with the SISA to avoid personal disqualification. Section 126K of the SISA further outlines the responsibilities by making it an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity if they are aware of their disqualified status. The seriousness of these obligations underscores the importance of adherence to the Act to maintain the integrity of superannuation management.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA can lead to significant consequences. Section 126K stipulates that knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity as a disqualified person is an offence, with a maximum penalty of two years in jail. This serves as a deterrent against non-compliance. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified person. The Act also provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, as outlined in section 344, allowing for a formal review process if the disqualified person believes the decision is unjust.