NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Marcia Legg
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Marcia Legg
Airport West VIC 3042
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 6 May 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pam Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for robust regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the industry operates efficiently and responsibly. The Act was introduced by the Parliament of Australia to establish the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and provide it with the powers necessary to supervise and regulate superannuation funds, thus mitigating risks to the financial stability of the sector and the economic well-being of Australians. The overarching policy objective of the Act is to maintain and enhance confidence in the superannuation system through effective regulation and oversight. Under this legislative framework, individuals found to have contravened the provisions of the Act can be disqualified from participating in the management of superannuation funds, as illustrated by the disqualification notice issued to Marcia Legg by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and regulation of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, this Act applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, responsible officers, and corporate trustees of superannuation entities, aiming to ensure the proper management and safeguarding of superannuation funds. The jurisdictional reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act, and it governs conduct and transactions within the superannuation industry across Australia. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals found to have contravened its provisions, which can include breaches of fiduciary duties, improper investment decisions, or mismanagement of funds. The Act also provides for the imposition of penalties, including the possibility of imprisonment, for disqualified persons who continue to act in a capacity they are barred from under the Act. The Act’s scope can be extended through subordinate instruments, which may include regulations and guidelines issued by the Commissioner of Taxation to further clarify the application of the Act.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides that a person may be disqualified from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry if they contravene the Act in a serious manner (subsection 126A(1)). This Act includes specific provisions detailing the grounds for disqualification and the process for making such a decision. In this case, Marcia Legg has been disqualified from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, based on the determination that she has contravened the Act and the seriousness of the contraventions. The disqualification takes effect immediately upon the issuance of the notice (subsection 126A(6)).
Under the Act, Marcia Legg is now prohibited from engaging in any role that involves being a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. This prohibition is enforceable by law and aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by preventing individuals who have demonstrated misconduct from managing their funds (section 126K). The Act imposes stringent obligations on individuals to comply with its provisions, ensuring that they act in the best interests of superannuation fund members and maintain high standards of conduct.
Failure to comply with the disqualification provisions can result in significant legal consequences. As stated under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any of the prohibited roles while knowing they are disqualified. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, reflecting the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of these disqualification provisions. Additionally, the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by the disqualified person (subsection 126A(5)).
For Marcia Legg, the disqualification not only restricts her professional activities but also serves as a formal record of her misconduct, which could impact her future employment opportunities in the superannuation industry. If Marcia Legg is dissatisfied with the decision, she has the right to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, as outlined in section 344 of the SISA. This request must be in writing and must specify the reasons why she believes the decision is incorrect.