NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ms Manal Nachar
Bankstown NSW 1885
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A (6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A (1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and the number of contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 11 April 2017
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Colleen Shelton
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A (7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A (5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address the need for effective regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry, ensuring that superannuation funds are managed in the best interests of members. The Act establishes the framework for the regulation of superannuation entities and their trustees, custodians, and investment managers, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation members through a robust regulatory environment. The SISA seeks to maintain confidence in the superannuation system by imposing standards of conduct and accountability on those managing superannuation funds. The notice of disqualification issued under this Act exemplifies its role in enforcing compliance and penalising serious breaches to safeguard the integrity of the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities within Australia. This Act aims to ensure the proper conduct and management of superannuation funds, covering trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act's jurisdiction extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, encompassing all states and territories, thereby establishing a national standard for the supervision of superannuation activities. However, the Act does not explicitly state exclusions or thresholds for its application, implying that it broadly applies to any person or entity involved in the management of superannuation funds unless otherwise specified by subordinate instruments or specific provisions within the Act. These subordinate instruments can further define the application of the Act, potentially extending or restricting its scope depending on the specific circumstances and conduct of individuals or entities within the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) referenced in the notice include subsection 126A (6) (2), which mandates the issuance of a notice of disqualification to an individual when they are disqualified by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. This notice is to inform the disqualified individual of the reason for their disqualification and that it has taken immediate effect. Additionally, subsection 126A (1) (3) provides the authority for a delegate to disqualify an individual who has contravened the SISA in a manner that warrants such action.
The SISA imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. For instance, it requires trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities to comply with specific legislative provisions aimed at safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members. Moreover, it mandates that disqualified individuals refrain from acting in any capacity that involves the management or oversight of superannuation entities, as outlined in section 126K (4). This is to ensure that those who have been found to be unfit for such roles due to their contraventions do not continue to have a role in the management of superannuation funds.
The Act also sets out serious consequences for breaches of its provisions. Under section 126K (5), it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate in such a role. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment (6). This serves as a deterrent against those who might otherwise ignore their disqualification and continue to engage in activities related to superannuation fund management.
There are also provisions for the revocation of disqualification. Under subsection 126A (5) (7), the disqualification can be revoked by the delegate either on their own initiative or upon the written application of the disqualified individual. This provides a mechanism for individuals to seek reinstatement if they believe the grounds for their disqualification no longer apply. Furthermore, under section 344 (8), any party who is affected by the decision of disqualification has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided they can articulate why they believe the decision is incorrect. This ensures that there is a process for reviewing the decision and potentially rectifying any perceived errors or injustices.