NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
LUKE SHANNON
TUMBI UMBI NSW 2261
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 18 August 2020
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per John Macuz
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for robust oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers adhere to stringent standards of conduct to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act establishes a comprehensive framework for the supervision of superannuation entities, including provisions for the disqualification of individuals who fail to meet the requisite standards. The enactment of the SISA was driven by the policy objective of safeguarding the financial wellbeing of superannuation fund members by ensuring that entities within the industry are managed responsibly and in compliance with the law. The Act was designed to mitigate risks associated with the mismanagement of superannuation funds, thereby enhancing the overall integrity and reliability of the superannuation system.
This legislation empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have been found to contravene the Act's provisions, as demonstrated in the case of Luke Shannon from Tumbi Umbi, NSW. The disqualification process, as outlined in the Act, involves a formal notice and is subject to certain legal requirements and procedural safeguards. The Act also stipulates penalties for disqualified individuals who continue to act in a capacity that they are barred from, reinforcing the seriousness with which the legislation treats breaches of its provisions. This approach is aimed at maintaining the highest standards of governance and accountability within the superannuation industry, thereby protecting the long-term financial security of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians, as well as responsible officers of corporate trustees. The act's jurisdictional reach is national, applying throughout Australia under the Commonwealth. The legislation specifically targets those who have contravened the provisions of the SISA, with the disqualification applying to responsible officers of corporate trustees where the corporate trustee has contravened the act's provisions. The disqualification may be imposed when the contraventions are deemed serious enough to warrant such action. The act provides for the disqualification to be revoked either by the delegate on their own initiative or upon the written application of the disqualified individual, subject to the provisions of the act. There are specific exclusions and exemptions within the act; however, the primary focus is on ensuring compliance and the integrity of the superannuation industry. The act also extends its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations and notices, to further define and refine the scope of its provisions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions for disqualifying individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities. Section 126A(2) allows for the disqualification of a person if they were a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the Act, and the contraventions were serious enough to warrant such a disqualification. Section 126A(6) requires that the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must give notice to the disqualified person, which includes details of the contraventions and the reason for the disqualification. This was done in the case of Luke Shannon, who was notified of his disqualification by James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, on 18 August 2020.
Under the SISA, the disqualification of a person has several implications for the individual and the entities they were involved with. Section 126K sets out that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as, or be, a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or a responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. The seriousness of these obligations is underscored by the fact that the maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment. This means that Luke Shannon is not only barred from managing superannuation entities but also risks severe legal consequences if he violates this prohibition.
In addition to these obligations, the SISA also provides mechanisms for the review and potential revocation of a disqualification. Section 126A(5) states that the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This offers a pathway for individuals like Luke Shannon to potentially have their disqualification lifted if they can demonstrate a change in circumstances or compliance with the requirements of the Act. Furthermore, section 344 allows for the reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if the affected person is not satisfied with the initial decision. This reconsideration request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and should detail the reasons why the decision is considered wrong.
The legislative framework under the SISA also includes provisions for the public notification of disqualifications. Subsection 126A(7) mandates that details of the disqualification must be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. This ensures transparency and public accountability, as the disqualification of individuals in significant roles within the superannuation industry is made publicly known. For Luke Shannon, this means that his disqualification is not only a personal and professional setback but also a matter of public record, which could have broader implications for his future career prospects and reputation in the industry.