NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Luisa Waqanivavalagi
Yagoona NSW 2199
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 20 April 2021
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pam Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for stringent regulation and oversight within the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians act in the best interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament with the policy objective of maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by preventing misconduct and ensuring compliance with the relevant standards. This legislative framework aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by imposing stringent requirements on the entities that manage these funds. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals from participating in the administration of superannuation funds if they have contravened the provisions of the Act in a manner that warrants such a penalty. This measure serves to uphold the standards of conduct expected within the superannuation industry and to deter potential misconduct.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act has a national jurisdictional reach, applying across Australia and governing conduct and transactions related to superannuation funds. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who have contravened its provisions, as exemplified in the notice to Luisa Waqanivavalagi. The disqualification prevents the individual from acting in certain roles within superannuation entities. The Act also provides for the publication of such disqualifications in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. There are specific exclusions and penalties outlined within the Act, including a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment for a disqualified person who knowingly acts in a prohibited capacity. The Commissioner of Taxation may revoke a disqualification at their discretion or upon application by the disqualified person, and the Act allows for reconsideration of the decision if the affected party is dissatisfied.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions for disqualifying individuals from participating in superannuation activities, particularly as trustees, investment managers, or custodians. Under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA, an individual can be disqualified if there are grounds to believe they have contravened the Act in a serious manner. This disqualification is formally communicated through a Notice of Disqualification, as mandated by subsection 126A(6) of the SISA. The notice informs the disqualified person of the decision and the reasons for it, along with the effective date of the disqualification.
The disqualification imposes significant obligations on the individual named. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that serves in these capacities. This means that the disqualified person is legally barred from engaging in any activities related to the management or administration of superannuation funds, which includes making decisions about investments, managing assets, or handling the financial affairs of superannuation entities.
Failure to comply with the disqualification can lead to serious legal consequences. Under the same section 126K, knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity while disqualified can result in criminal charges, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This penalty underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of disqualification orders. Additionally, the disqualification can be revoked under subsection 126A(5), either on the initiative of the delegate or upon a written application from the disqualified person.
In the event that an individual believes the disqualification is unjust, they have recourse to the Commissioner of Taxation. Section 344 of the SISA provides that a request for reconsideration must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the disqualification decision. The request must outline the reasons for believing the decision is wrong. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for challenging the decision and potentially having it overturned or modified.