NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Lucy Kamara
LIVERPOOL NSW 2170
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 6 January 2021
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Lyndal Ratcliffe
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address issues and gaps in the oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, with the aim of protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was enacted by the Parliament of Australia, reflecting a policy objective to ensure that superannuation entities are managed with integrity and competence, safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. In a specific instance, the Act provides mechanisms for the disqualification of responsible officers of corporate trustees if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act, ensuring that those who fail to uphold the required standards are held accountable and prevented from continuing to manage superannuation entities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds within Australia. Specifically, the Act imposes obligations and prohibitions on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, as well as responsible officers of corporate trustees. The Act extends its reach across the Commonwealth, thereby applying to all superannuation entities and related individuals and entities operating within Australia. The Act's application is triggered by contraventions of its provisions, which can lead to disqualification of individuals such as Lucy Kamara, who was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. Exclusions or exemptions from the Act are not specified in the provided text, and its application may be further defined through subordinate instruments. The Act's serious nature is underscored by the potential criminal penalties for disqualified persons who continue to act in prohibited capacities, as well as the administrative process for reconsideration and potential revocation of disqualifications.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals from being involved with superannuation entities. Section 126A(2) and (6) of the SISA provide that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify a person if they are satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA and the person was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions, with the seriousness of the contraventions warranting disqualification. The notice of disqualification, as outlined in the document, informs the disqualified person that they are prohibited from being or acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This disqualification takes immediate effect from the date of the notice.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on the parties it governs include the requirement for responsible officers of corporate trustees to ensure compliance with the Act. Section 126K of the SISA mandates that a disqualified person must not be, or act as, a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This is a strict requirement, and failure to comply can lead to severe consequences. It is the responsibility of the individual to ensure they are not involved in any capacity that could result in further contraventions of the SISA.
Breaching the disqualification provisions outlined in the SISA can result in serious consequences. Section 126K of the Act makes it an offence for a disqualified person who knows they are disqualified to be, or act as, a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness of the Act's provisions. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the revocation of the disqualification notice on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon the written application of the disqualified person. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for the Commissioner to reconsider a decision if the disqualified person is not satisfied with it, provided the request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision and includes the reasons for the dissatisfaction.