NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – LOUISE ANN HANSEN
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
LOUISE ANN HANSEN
MOUNT RICHON WA 6112
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 30 June 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Christiane Boissezon
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide for the effective regulation of the superannuation industry, addressing issues such as the management of superannuation funds and the protection of fund members. The Act was introduced by the Parliament of Australia to establish a regulatory framework that ensures the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members. The policy objective of the SISA is to promote the proper administration and management of superannuation funds, ensuring that trustees and other responsible persons act in the best interests of fund members. The Act was designed to fill a critical gap in the regulation of the superannuation industry, providing mechanisms for the supervision, enforcement, and compliance of superannuation entities. The SISA aims to maintain public confidence in the superannuation system by ensuring that superannuation funds are managed responsibly and that trustees and other responsible persons are held accountable for their actions.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, specifically targeting trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The jurisdiction of the Act extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, with its provisions enforceable nationally. The Act aims to ensure the integrity and efficiency of the superannuation industry by regulating conduct and transactions within this sector. Louise Ann Hansen, the individual mentioned in the disqualification notice, falls within the scope of the Act due to her involvement in the superannuation industry, as evidenced by the contraventions that led to her disqualification. This notice highlights the serious consequences of breaching the Act, including potential criminal penalties for disqualified persons who continue to act in prohibited capacities. The Act also provides mechanisms for the review and potential revocation of disqualifications, ensuring a fair process for those affected by such decisions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains several key provisions relevant to the disqualification of individuals such as Louise Ann Hansen. Under subsection 126A(1), the Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened the SISA, particularly if the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such action. In this instance, Louise Ann Hansen has been disqualified as per subsection 126A(6). This disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance of the notice, as outlined in the notice dated 30 June 2022, signed by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation.
The disqualification imposes significant obligations and requirements on Louise Ann Hansen. Primarily, it prohibits her from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, as well as from being a responsible officer or a body corporate involved in such capacities. These restrictions are aimed at preventing individuals with a history of serious contraventions from participating in the administration or management of superannuation entities, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. Furthermore, under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to contravene these restrictions, and the maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment.
In addition to these operational requirements, the SISA also sets out the potential consequences of breaching the disqualification order. If Louise Ann Hansen, knowing she is disqualified, engages in any activities prohibited by her disqualification, she commits an offence under the Act. The seriousness of such an offence is underscored by the substantial penalty of up to two years in jail, illustrating the importance the legislation places on compliance with disqualification orders. Moreover, the Act provides for the possibility of revoking the disqualification, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person, as per subsection 126A(5). For those affected by the disqualification decision and dissatisfied with it, section 344 of the SISA allows for a request to the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving notice, provided the request is made in writing and includes reasons for dissatisfaction.