NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - LEOPOLDO LEGASPI
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
LEOPOLDO LEGASPI
ROPES CROSSING NSW 2760
I, Emma Rosenzweig , a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 12 October 2021
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Christiane Boissezon
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to ensure the effective supervision of the superannuation industry, addressing the need for stringent oversight to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. This Act was established by the Commonwealth Parliament, aiming to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. The policy objective underpinning the Act is to provide robust regulatory measures that ensure compliance and deter misconduct within the superannuation sector. This legislative framework enables the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals found to have contravened the provisions of the Act, particularly where their actions are deemed serious enough to warrant such a measure. Consequently, this disqualification serves as a deterrent against future non-compliance and maintains the overall trust in the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry in Australia. It regulates the conduct of trustees, investment managers, custodians, and other responsible officers of superannuation entities to ensure compliance with the law. The Act applies nationally, covering both Commonwealth and state jurisdictions, and encompasses various entities such as trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers within superannuation funds. The Act's scope includes the management of funds and the conduct of those entrusted with these responsibilities. Certain exclusions and exemptions may apply, but the Act is broad in its reach to cover most entities and individuals involved in superannuation activities. The Act may extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or guidelines, which provide further detail on specific provisions and their implementation.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the notice of disqualification issued under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) include subsections 126A(1), 126A(6), and 126A(7). Section 126A(1) provides the power to disqualify a person from participating in the superannuation industry if there are grounds for doing so. Section 126A(6) requires the Commissioner of Taxation or a delegate to provide notice of the disqualification, as demonstrated in the notice given to Leopoldo Legaspi. Section 126A(7) mandates that details of the disqualification be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. These provisions ensure that any disqualification is communicated and made publicly known, providing transparency and accountability within the superannuation industry.
The SISA imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. It requires trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers to comply with the provisions of the Act to ensure the proper administration of superannuation entities. It also mandates that any disqualified person must not be, or act as, a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This is to prevent disqualified individuals from continuing to influence or manage superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of fund members.
The Act outlines specific offences and penalties for breaches of its provisions. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty underscores the seriousness of the offence and the importance of adhering to the disqualification provisions. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked by the Commissioner of Taxation or a delegate either on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified person.
For those affected by the disqualification decision, the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. Under section 344, a written request for reconsideration must be made within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision. This request must detail the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect, providing an opportunity for the affected party to challenge the decision and seek a review by the Commissioner. This process ensures that there is a formal avenue for addressing grievances and seeking redress if the disqualification is considered unjust.