NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Leon Pham - 21 January 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
LEON PHAM
CLAYTON VIC 3168
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 21 January 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Karen Taylor
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to regulate the superannuation industry and ensure the protection of superannuation benefits. The act was introduced to address the problem of ensuring that trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities adhere to the necessary standards and regulations to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members. The act aims to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by enforcing compliance and penalising misconduct. The notice of disqualification issued under this act highlights its policy objective of maintaining high standards of conduct within the superannuation industry by disqualifying individuals who have acted contrary to the provisions of the act, thereby protecting the superannuation benefits of members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees within the superannuation industry, specifically targeting those who have contravened the Act, thereby providing grounds for disqualification. The disqualification applies to individuals like Leon Pham, who were responsible officers at the time of the contraventions and where the seriousness of the contraventions justifies such action. The jurisdictional reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth statute. The Act explicitly prohibits disqualified persons from acting as trustees, investment managers, custodians of superannuation entities, or as responsible officers or body corporates that serve in these capacities. Furthermore, the Act stipulates that failure to comply with this prohibition constitutes an offence, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. Notably, the Act allows for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification under certain conditions, such as an application by the disqualified person or an initiative by the authorities. In addition, the Act provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied with the outcome, with such a request needing to be lodged within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains various provisions for the regulation of superannuation trustees, with section 126A being particularly significant. Section 126A(2) allows for the disqualification of a person from being a responsible officer if they have contravened the SISA, and the seriousness of these contraventions warrants such a disqualification. Section 126A(6) mandates that a notice of disqualification must be given to the person in question, as per the case of Leon Pham. The disqualification takes immediate effect on the date the notice is issued, as outlined in the notice provided to Leon Pham by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation.
Under the SISA, the obligations of a responsible officer are stringent, requiring compliance with all provisions of the Act. These include, but are not limited to, duties of care, loyalty, and prudence in managing superannuation funds. Responsible officers must ensure that the corporate trustees adhere to the legislative requirements, which encompass financial reporting, investment standards, and member communication. Failure to comply with these obligations can lead to serious repercussions, including personal disqualification.
Section 126K of the SISA imposes significant penalties for breaches related to disqualification. Specifically, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such positions. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment. Additionally, the SISA provides mechanisms for the revocation of disqualification, either at the initiative of the Commissioner or upon application by the disqualified person, as noted in section 126A(5). Furthermore, section 344 allows for a reconsideration request by the affected party within 21 days of receiving the disqualification notice, providing a formal avenue for challenging the decision.