Notice of Disqualification – Leila Kassem – 11 October 2024

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2024N00950 In force Notifiable Instrument

Legislation content

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Leila Kassem – 11 October 2024

 

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

 

To:

 

Leila Kassem

 

MERRYLANDS NSW 2160

 

I, Andrew Watson, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsections 126A(2) and 126A(3) of the SISA.

 

I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.

 

I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.

 

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 11 October 2024

 

 

Andrew Watson

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

 

Per Justinbal Sandhu


Note 1:

Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..

 

Note 2:

Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:

    trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity

    responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity

 

The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.

 

Note 3:

Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.

 

Note 4:

Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia. The legislation aims to protect superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities act in the best interests of the members. The SISA was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament and establishes a framework for the licensing and regulation of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, safeguarding the financial interests of superannuation fund members. In the case of Leila Kassem, her disqualification under the SISA highlights the enforcement mechanisms available to the Commissioner of Taxation to prevent unfit and improper individuals from holding positions of responsibility within the superannuation industry.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers and trustees of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards within the superannuation industry. This Act has a national reach, operating across the Commonwealth of Australia and affecting entities that manage superannuation funds. Its jurisdiction includes individuals and corporate bodies responsible for administering and managing superannuation entities. The Act’s application is not limited by geographic boundaries, applying uniformly across all states and territories. The legislation explicitly excludes certain entities and conduct from its purview, though specific exclusions are not detailed in this notice. Furthermore, the Act's provisions can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, allowing for the detailed regulation of superannuation activities. This notice of disqualification, issued under the authority of the SISA, highlights the Act’s enforcement mechanisms, including the power to disqualify individuals from acting as trustees or responsible officers if they are deemed unfit or if serious contraventions occur.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context are subsections 126A(2), 126A(3), 126A(5), and 126A(7). Subsection 126A(2) and 126A(3) allow for the disqualification of a responsible officer of a corporate trustee if the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA and the officer was present during those contraventions. Subsection 126A(5) provides the mechanism for potential revocation of the disqualification, either by the delegate on their own initiative or on the written application of the disqualified person. Finally, subsection 126A(7) mandates the publication of details of this disqualification notice as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation. The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. It requires responsible officers of corporate trustees to ensure compliance with the SISA to avoid personal disqualification. If a corporate trustee contravenes the SISA, and the responsible officer was aware or should have been aware of the contraventions, they may be disqualified. Additionally, the Act mandates the publication of disqualification notices in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and accountability. The SISA also includes provisions for potential offences and penalties for breaches. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person who knows they are disqualified to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of such an entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years in jail. This serves as a deterrent to ensure compliance with the Act’s requirements. Furthermore, the Act provides avenues for reconsideration of the disqualification decision. Under section 344, if a person affected by the disqualification is not satisfied with the decision, they can request the Commissioner to reconsider it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision and must include the reasons why the decision is considered wrong. This provision ensures that there is a process in place for reviewing and potentially overturning disqualification decisions, thereby providing a measure of fairness and due process.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Superannuation Law
Instrument
Notifiable Instrument
Concepts
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.