NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – LAYTH ROOMIE
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
LAYTH ROOMIE
TOONGABBIE NSW 2146
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126(A)2 of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 14 January 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Nichola Wood-Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address issues and ensure effective oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation aims to protect superannuation fund members by establishing a regulatory framework that includes licensing requirements, governance standards, and compliance measures for entities involved in the superannuation industry. The SISA was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament to provide a robust regulatory environment that safeguards the interests of superannuation fund members and promotes the efficient and effective operation of the industry. The overarching policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians act in the best interests of fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. This Act has a national reach across Australia, as it is a Commonwealth Act, thereby applying to all entities and persons involved in the superannuation industry, regardless of the state or territory in which they operate. The disqualification notice under the SISA applies specifically to Layth Roomie of Toongabbie, NSW, for contraventions of the Act. The Act's provisions extend to prohibiting a disqualified person from acting or being in specified roles within superannuation entities, and failure to comply with these provisions can result in criminal penalties, including up to two years in jail. The disqualification can be revoked either by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Additionally, the Act provides for reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if the affected party submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, detailing the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision.
Key Provisions
The primary sections involved in this disqualification notice under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) are sections 126(A) and 126A(6). Section 126(A) provides the authority to disqualify an individual from participating in the superannuation industry if they have contravened the Act in a manner that warrants such a penalty. The notice, as detailed in subsection 126A(6), informs the disqualified individual that they have been disqualified by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, in this case, Emma Rosenzweig. The notice specifies that the disqualification is due to a contravention of the SISA that is serious enough to warrant this action. Importantly, the disqualification takes immediate effect from the date the notice is issued.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on the parties it governs include adherence to the legislative standards set forth in the SISA. For Layth Roomie, as the disqualified individual, this means he must not engage in activities that would make him a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, nor can he act as a responsible officer or be part of a body corporate performing such roles. The Act requires strict compliance to ensure the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds. Any deviation from these standards can lead to disqualification.
The Act imposes significant penalties for breaches of the disqualification order. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity related to the management or administration of a superannuation entity, such as being a trustee, investment manager, or custodian. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years in jail. This severe penalty underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of the disqualification provisions. Additionally, the notice informs that the details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public awareness of such actions.
The Act also provides avenues for review and potential revocation of the disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual, Layth Roomie, if he believes the disqualification is unjust. Furthermore, under section 344 of the SISA, Layth Roomie has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision if he is dissatisfied with it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should include the reasons for believing the decision is wrong. This ensures that there is a formal process in place for addressing grievances related to the disqualification.