NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - LARRISSA DIANNE KOSTOGLOU
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
LARRISSA DIANNE KOSTOGLOU
CORNUBIA QLD 4130
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 20 April 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Mark Webberley
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A (7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A (5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a regulatory framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and other responsible officers act in the best interests of the members. The Act was introduced to address the need for comprehensive regulation of the superannuation industry, particularly focusing on preventing and penalising misconduct by those entrusted with managing superannuation funds. The SISA was enacted by the Parliament of Australia and its policy objective is to safeguard the financial well-being and retirement security of superannuation fund members by imposing stringent requirements on the conduct of trustees and other responsible officers, and by providing for penalties for breaches of these requirements.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration, management, and oversight of superannuation funds within Australia. The Act is a Commonwealth statute, meaning it has national jurisdiction and applies across all states and territories. It covers a broad range of conduct and transactions associated with superannuation entities, including the appointment and disqualification of trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The Act's provisions ensure the integrity and proper functioning of the superannuation system by establishing standards and regulatory oversight. The disqualification of individuals such as Larissa Dianne Kostoglou exemplifies the Act's enforcement mechanisms, which are designed to maintain high standards of conduct within the superannuation industry. Exclusions or exemptions are typically specified within the Act or through subordinate instruments, but the primary focus remains on ensuring compliance and accountability among those involved in superannuation activities.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context are sections 126A and 126K. Section 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of individuals from participating in superannuation entities if there are grounds for such a decision based on serious contraventions of the Act. The notice provided under section 126A(6) informs the disqualified individual of the disqualification and the reasons behind it, as demonstrated in the case of Larissa Dianne Kostoglou. Section 126K, on the other hand, outlines the offences and penalties for disqualified individuals who continue to act as trustees, investment managers, custodians, or responsible officers of superannuation entities, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on parties or entities it governs are multifaceted. Trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities are required to adhere strictly to the provisions of the SISA. They must ensure that their activities are transparent, compliant with the law, and in the best interests of the members of the superannuation funds they manage. The Act also mandates that these individuals must not engage in any conduct that could undermine the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. Failure to comply with these obligations can lead to severe consequences, including disqualification and potential criminal penalties.
The Act imposes significant penalties and consequences for breaches, as outlined in section 126K. If a disqualified person knowingly continues to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity, they commit an offence. The maximum penalty for this offence is imprisonment for up to two years, reflecting the seriousness with which the Act treats such contraventions. Additionally, the disqualification itself is a substantial deterrent, preventing the individual from participating in any capacity within the superannuation industry.
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This provision offers a potential pathway for reinstatement, provided that the disqualified person can demonstrate that the grounds for disqualification no longer exist. Section 344 of the SISA also allows for a reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied with the disqualification. This reconsideration request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision, and must include the reasons for believing the decision to be incorrect.