NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To: Mr Lam Thanh Ly
BURNSIDE HEIGHTS VIC 3023
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 27 March 2013
Ivan Parrett,
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address the need for oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation was introduced to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers act in the best interests of members and comply with the law. The Act provides for the regulation of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, and includes provisions for disqualification of individuals who fail to meet these standards. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by enforcing compliance and penalising misconduct. In this context, the Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from managing superannuation entities if they have contravened the Act's provisions in a manner that warrants such action.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to persons and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds within Australia. Specifically, the Act governs trustees, responsible officers, trustees of bodies corporate, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The SIS Act operates across the entire Commonwealth of Australia, setting a uniform standard for the supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry. It provides detailed guidelines on the conduct and transactions permissible within the industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act’s provisions can be extended or refined through subordinate instruments, which may specify additional requirements or clarify certain provisions. In the case of Mr Lam Thanh Ly, the notice of disqualification highlights the Act’s enforcement mechanisms, illustrating its application to individuals who have contravened its provisions. The disqualification order, effective immediately upon notice, underscores the Act's intent to maintain high standards of conduct within the superannuation sector.
Key Provisions
The notice given to Mr Lam Thanh Ly under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) informs him of a decision to disqualify him from holding positions such as trustee or responsible officer in entities managing superannuation funds. This decision is made because Mr Ly is believed to have contravened the SIS Act multiple times, with the breaches being significant enough to warrant disqualification (subsection 126A(1)). The disqualification order is effective from the date of the notice, which in this case is 27 March 2013.
The SIS Act imposes certain obligations on the parties it governs, including trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities. These obligations include compliance with the provisions of the Act, which are designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. Trustees and responsible officers must ensure they adhere to the legal standards set forth in the Act, including but not limited to, proper management of fund assets, accurate record-keeping, and transparent dealings. The failure to comply with these obligations can lead to various repercussions, including the disqualification mentioned in the notice to Mr Ly.
Breaches of the SIS Act can result in significant penalties and consequences. Under the Act, individuals who are disqualified from managing superannuation entities face not only the loss of their roles but also potential legal and financial ramifications. The Act provides for both civil and criminal penalties for serious breaches. For example, section 126A allows for disqualification from managing superannuation entities, while other sections may outline fines or imprisonment for more severe offences. The specific penalties depend on the nature and severity of the contraventions, but they are designed to deter non-compliance and protect the interests of superannuation fund members.
Furthermore, the notice to Mr Ly indicates that details of his disqualification will be published in the Gazette as per subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act. This public notice serves as an additional deterrent and informs the public and other industry participants of the disqualification. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification order can be revoked either by the Commissioner on their own initiative or upon a written application from Mr Ly. This provides a mechanism for review and potential reinstatement, subject to meeting certain conditions.
Finally, if Mr Ly is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, he has the right to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, as stipulated in section 344 of the SIS Act. This request must be made in writing and include the reasons for the reconsideration. This provision ensures that affected parties have an opportunity to challenge the decision and seek a resolution.