NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Laith Alchinno
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Laith Alchinno
CARNES HILL NSW 2171
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 2 July 2021
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Nello Di Salle
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was introduced to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, aiming to ensure that superannuation funds are managed responsibly and that the interests of members are protected. The enactment of the SISA aimed to fill the gap in comprehensive regulation of the superannuation sector, addressing issues such as improper conduct and breaches of trust by individuals involved in the management of superannuation funds. In the case of Laith Alchinno, the SISA has been applied to disqualify him from acting in any capacity related to the management of superannuation entities due to contraventions of the Act. The disqualification is a direct consequence of the serious nature of the breaches, reinforcing the policy objective of maintaining the integrity and reliability of the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The Act's reach extends to the Commonwealth level, providing a national framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry. The Act imposes obligations and restrictions on disqualified persons, prohibiting them from acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, or from being responsible officers or body corporates in such capacities. The disqualification can be imposed on individuals found to have contravened the Act, with the decision communicated through a notice and subsequently published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. Penalties for contravening the Act include significant fines and imprisonment, emphasising the importance of compliance. Furthermore, the Act allows for the possibility of disqualification revocation, either through the delegate's initiative or upon application by the disqualified person, and provides avenues for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this Notice of Disqualification under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) inform Laith Alchinno that he has been disqualified from acting in roles such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity (subsection 126A(1), 126A(6)). This disqualification is due to his contravention of the SISA, with the seriousness of the breaches warranting such action (subsection 126A(1), 126A(6)). The notice also indicates that details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette (subsection 126A(7)). The disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice (subsection 126A(6)).
Under the SISA, Laith Alchinno is now legally obligated to refrain from acting or being involved in any capacity as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, as well as from being a responsible officer or a body corporate in such roles (section 126K). Failure to comply with these obligations could result in criminal charges, with the potential penalty being up to two years in jail (section 126K). Additionally, Laith Alchinno has the right to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided he submits a written request outlining why he believes the decision is incorrect (section 344). Furthermore, the disqualification can be revoked either on the delegate's own initiative or upon Laith Alchinno's written application (subsection 126A(5)).
The SISA imposes stringent obligations on Laith Alchinno, prohibiting him from engaging in any activities that would involve him acting in roles where he has a fiduciary duty to manage superannuation funds. This includes avoiding any involvement with entities that offer superannuation services, ensuring he does not participate in decision-making processes that impact superannuation beneficiaries. These obligations are designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and maintain the integrity of the superannuation system.
Breaches of the SISA by a disqualified person like Laith Alchinno can lead to severe consequences. As per section 126K, knowingly acting in prohibited capacities can result in criminal charges, with the maximum penalty being a two-year jail term. This underscores the seriousness with which the legislation treats violations related to superannuation management. Additionally, the requirement to publish details of the disqualification in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette serves as a public notice of the individual's ineligibility to engage in these roles, further deterring any attempts to circumvent the disqualification.
Should Laith Alchinno believe that the disqualification is unjust, he has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and should detail the reasons why he considers the decision to be incorrect (section 344). This provision ensures that there is a formal mechanism for review, offering a level of procedural fairness. Additionally, the possibility of revocation of the disqualification on the delegate's initiative or through Laith Alchinno's written application (subsection 126A(5)) provides a pathway for potential reinstatement under certain conditions.