NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Kylie Parkes
PENRITH NSW 2750
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 24 May 2019
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Robyn Bowden
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities act in the best interests of fund members. The Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament with the policy objective of protecting the interests of superannuation fund members by enforcing standards of competence, conduct, and disclosure. The SISA provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds, thereby maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. In the case of Kylie Parkes, a disqualification notice under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA has been issued, effectively barring her from serving as a trustee or a responsible officer due to concerns regarding her fitness and propriety in managing superannuation entities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to trustees, responsible officers, and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds in Australia. The Act specifically targets individuals or corporate bodies that serve as trustees or responsible officers of a superannuation entity, ensuring that these individuals and entities meet certain fitness and propriety standards. This legislation has a national reach across Australia, as it is a Commonwealth Act, meaning it applies uniformly throughout all states and territories. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals deemed unfit to hold such positions. The disqualification is immediate upon notice, and details of such disqualifications are published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. There are no specified exclusions or thresholds within the Act; rather, it broadly applies to anyone involved in the administration of superannuation funds. The Act’s scope can be further defined or extended through subordinate instruments, which may include regulations or administrative guidelines issued by the Commissioner.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals deemed unfit to serve as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities. Section 126A(3) of the SISA empowers a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who are not fit and proper persons to hold such positions. This disqualification is communicated through a formal notice, as seen in the notice given to Kylie Parkes, who was disqualified from being a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The disqualification notice specifies the reasons for the decision and indicates that the disqualification is effective immediately.
Under the SISA, certain obligations are imposed on trustees and responsible officers. Trustees and responsible officers must meet specific criteria to ensure they are fit and proper to manage superannuation funds, including being of good character, having the necessary skills and experience, and not having engaged in conduct that would disqualify them. The obligations are clearly outlined in sections such as 91(1) and 91A(1) of the SISA, which detail the duties and responsibilities of trustees and responsible officers.
The SISA also sets out clear consequences for breaches of its provisions. Section 126K of the SISA establishes that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such an entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of its disqualification provisions. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the delegate or through a written application by the disqualified person.
In the event that an individual is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, section 344 of the SISA provides a recourse. Any person affected by the decision can request the Commissioner to reconsider it. This reconsideration request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and should include the reasons for believing that the decision is incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a mechanism for addressing grievances and potentially overturning unjust disqualifications.