NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Kyle Geddes – 28 November 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Kyle Geddes
BOHLE PLAINS QLD 4817
I, Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 28 November 2025
Ben Kelly
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Karen A Taylor
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act aims to ensure the proper administration and management of superannuation funds to protect the interests of members and beneficiaries. Enacted by the Australian Parliament, the policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity, efficiency, and soundness of the superannuation system. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals from participating in the administration of superannuation entities if they have contravened the provisions of the Act. This legislative measure is designed to safeguard the superannuation industry against misconduct and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. Under the SISA, a disqualified person who knowingly acts in a capacity that requires authorisation faces criminal penalties, including imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of its provisions.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds within Australia. The Act specifically targets trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The geographic reach of the Act is national, covering all states and territories in Australia. The Act imposes stringent requirements and standards on the conduct and operations of those involved in the superannuation industry, with significant penalties for non-compliance. Notably, the Act includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals found to have contravened its provisions. This disqualification can occur when an individual has contravened the Act on multiple occasions, leading to a determination that they are unfit to manage superannuation entities. The disqualification is immediate and includes restrictions on acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity, with potential criminal penalties for those who continue to engage in such roles post-disqualification. The Act also allows for the revocation of disqualifications under certain conditions, and provides avenues for appeal and reconsideration of disqualification decisions.
Key Provisions
The notice issued to Kyle Geddes under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) notifies him of his disqualification by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. This disqualification stems from subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, which becomes applicable when there is sufficient evidence that the individual has contravened the SISA on multiple occasions, warranting such a severe action. The disqualification is immediate, taking effect on the date of the notice, which is 28 November 2025.
This legislative instrument imposes significant obligations on Kyle Geddes, particularly concerning his future activities related to superannuation entities. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to serve, or act as, a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that fulfils any of these roles. The gravity of this offence is underscored by the severe penalty, which includes up to two years imprisonment, illustrating the importance of compliance with the SISA.
In addition to the immediate disqualification, the notice also informs Kyle Geddes that the details of this disqualification will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA. This public disclosure serves as a formal record and a deterrent, reinforcing the seriousness of non-compliance with the Act. Furthermore, the notice highlights the potential for the disqualification to be revoked under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, either on the initiative of the authorities or following a written application by the disqualified individual.
For Kyle Geddes, who may be dissatisfied with the decision, the Act provides a recourse under section 344 of the SISA. This section allows him to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This reconsideration request must be in writing and should detail the reasons why he believes the decision is incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a mechanism in place for addressing grievances and potentially rectifying any perceived errors in the disqualification decision.