NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Kunhahamed Thayyil
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Kunhahamed Thayyil
TRUGANINA VIC 3029
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 18 August 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Rebecca Bain
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure that superannuation entities are managed with integrity and in the best interests of members. This legislation was introduced to address significant concerns over mismanagement, misconduct, and breaches of fiduciary duties within the superannuation industry, creating a need for robust oversight and regulatory measures. The Act is overseen by the Australian Parliament and aims to protect superannuation members by ensuring that only fit and proper persons manage their superannuation funds. The policy objective is to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry by disqualifying individuals who have demonstrated unsuitability through repeated or serious breaches of the Act. This approach helps to deter misconduct and maintain public confidence in the administration of superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act operates across the Commonwealth of Australia, and its provisions extend to any person or entity that engages in activities related to the governance and management of superannuation funds. The disqualification power under the SISA can be applied to any individual who has contravened the provisions of the Act, with the notice of disqualification and subsequent publication in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette ensuring transparency and accountability. The Act explicitly excludes certain individuals or entities from its purview if they meet specified criteria or if the nature of their involvement in the superannuation industry is deemed minor or non-regulatory. Additionally, the Act allows for the extension of its application through subordinate instruments, which may further define the scope and detail the specific circumstances under which disqualifications may be imposed.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions for disqualifying individuals from certain roles related to superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the Act. Section 126A(1) allows for disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act on one or more occasions, particularly if the number and seriousness of the contraventions warrant such action. This was the basis for the disqualification notice issued to Kunhahamed Thayyil, who was found to have contravened the SISA. The notice, provided under subsection 126A(6), informs the individual that the disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance.
Under the SISA, the disqualified individual is prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or being a responsible officer or body corporate in such roles, as per section 126K. This restriction is designed to prevent individuals with a history of serious contraventions from managing or influencing superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The obligation to comply with these restrictions is clear and strict, with the potential for severe consequences for non-compliance.
Failure to adhere to the disqualification provisions can result in criminal penalties. Section 126K explicitly states that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any of the prohibited roles while aware of their disqualification. The maximum penalty for this offence, as outlined in the Act, is two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty underscores the importance of compliance with the disqualification provisions and the potential seriousness of the consequences for non-compliance.
The disqualification notice also includes provisions for possible revocation of the disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the relevant authorities or following a written application by the disqualified person. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the disqualification decision. If Kunhahamed Thayyil is dissatisfied with the decision, he can request the Commissioner to reconsider it in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice. This process ensures that there is an avenue for review and potential rectification if the initial decision is deemed to be in error or unjust.