NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ms Kim Honor
BAULKHAM HILLS NSW 2153
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 14 December 2017
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Robert Moon
Acting Director, Superannuation Engagement and Assurance
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for effective oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. This legislation empowers the Australian Taxation Office and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority to supervise and regulate superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The enactment of the SISA aimed to fill a critical gap in the regulation of the superannuation industry, ensuring that entities managing superannuation funds adhere to high standards of governance and accountability. The Act was passed by the Parliament of Australia with the policy objective of safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation members by enforcing stringent regulatory measures and providing mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals found to have contravened the provisions of the Act. The Act thus serves to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, fostering trust and confidence among participants.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and regulation of superannuation funds within Australia. The Act encompasses trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. It sets out standards for the conduct of these individuals and entities, ensuring that they act in the best interests of superannuation fund members. The SISA has a national reach, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia, including all states and territories. Notably, the Act imposes disqualifications on individuals who contravene its provisions, preventing them from acting in designated roles within the superannuation industry. Exclusions or exemptions are minimal, as the Act aims to maintain high standards of integrity and compliance across the sector. The application of the Act can be extended or clarified through subordinate instruments, which may provide further detail on specific provisions or penalties.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides for the disqualification of individuals from certain roles within superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the Act. Section 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of a person if they have contravened the SISA, and section 126A(6) mandates that the Commissioner of Taxation must provide notice of such disqualification. In the notice to Ms Kim Honor, it is stated that she has been disqualified under subsection 126A(1) due to contraventions of the SISA, and this disqualification takes immediate effect upon the issuance of the notice.
The Act imposes certain obligations on individuals who are subject to its provisions. For example, under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian of a superannuation entity, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles. This means that Ms Honor, being disqualified, cannot legally assume any of these roles within a superannuation entity. Additionally, the Act requires that details of such disqualifications be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, as per subsection 126A(7).
Breaching the provisions of the SISA can result in significant consequences. Section 126K explicitly states that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any of the prohibited roles, and the maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment. This underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats contraventions of its provisions. Moreover, subsection 126A(5) provides that the disqualification can be revoked by the Commissioner either on their own initiative or upon a written application from the disqualified person, indicating a mechanism for potential reinstatement after fulfilling certain conditions.
For those who feel aggrieved by the decision to disqualify them, the Act provides a recourse. Under section 344, an affected individual can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This reconsideration request must be made in writing and should outline the reasons why the individual believes the decision is incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for challenging disqualifications and seeking rectification if warranted.