NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Kewa Ngamko Ruwhiu
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Kewa Ngamko Ruwhiu
MOUNT DRUITT NSW 2770
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 12 September 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Antonio Macolino
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for the regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and other key personnel act in the best interest of members. This Act is overseen by the Australian Parliament, with the aim of maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. The Act provides mechanisms for disqualifying individuals who engage in serious misconduct or breaches of the Act, ensuring that those who fail to uphold the required standards are prevented from participating in the superannuation industry. The legislation includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act, as well as the publication of such disqualifications to maintain transparency and accountability within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to any person who engages in activities related to the supervision and management of superannuation funds within Australia. This includes trustees, investment managers, custodians, and other responsible officers or corporate entities involved with superannuation entities. The jurisdictional reach of the SISA is Commonwealth-wide, applying to entities and individuals across all states and territories. The legislation provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals who have contravened the provisions of the Act, particularly when the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such action. The disqualification prohibits the individual from acting in roles such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian of superannuation entities or being associated with entities that perform these roles. The Act also allows for the revocation of disqualifications and provides avenues for appeal or reconsideration of disqualification decisions. Additionally, the SISA outlines significant penalties for disqualified persons who continue to act in prohibited roles, including potential imprisonment for up to two years.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a significant piece of Australian legislation designed to regulate the superannuation industry and protect the interests of superannuation fund members. One of the key provisions of the SISA is the power to disqualify individuals from participating in the management of superannuation funds. Specifically, subsection 126A(1) allows the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person if they are satisfied that the person has contravened the SISA and the seriousness of the contravention warrants such action. This disqualification is immediate upon issuance of the notice, as stated in subsection 126A(6). In the case of Kewa Ngamko Ruwhiu, the delegate of the Commissioner, Emma Rosenzweig, has exercised this power on 12 September 2022.
The Act imposes strict obligations on individuals who are disqualified from managing superannuation funds. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate in such a capacity. This prohibition is intended to prevent individuals with a history of misconduct from influencing the financial well-being of superannuation fund members. The consequences of breaching these provisions are severe, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment as outlined in section 126K.
In addition to the immediate disqualification, the SISA provides mechanisms for potential revocation of the disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5), the delegate of the Commissioner may revoke the disqualification either on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This offers a pathway for individuals to potentially have their disqualification lifted if they can demonstrate a change in circumstances or behavior warranting such relief. Furthermore, for those who disagree with the decision to disqualify them, section 344 of the SISA allows for a request to the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and must detail the reasons why the decision is considered incorrect. This process ensures that affected individuals have an opportunity to challenge the decision and seek redress if they believe it was made in error.