NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mrs Katrina Rosalie Masters
HILLVUE NSW 2340
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 16 October 2012
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted to address the need for a robust regulatory framework to oversee the operations of superannuation entities, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and the rights of fund members. This legislation was introduced to mitigate risks associated with the mismanagement of superannuation funds and to promote the integrity and stability of the superannuation industry. The SIS Act was enacted by the Australian Parliament, aiming to provide a comprehensive set of rules governing the establishment, operation, and administration of superannuation funds. The overarching policy objective of the SIS Act is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by imposing strict compliance and governance standards on trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act establishes a framework that includes licensing requirements, ongoing monitoring, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure adherence to these standards, thereby fostering trust and confidence in the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and regulation of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, it applies to trustees, responsible officers, trustees of body corporates, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. This legislation has a national reach, governing the conduct and transactions of superannuation entities across the Commonwealth of Australia, including states and territories. The Act's scope extends to prohibiting certain conduct that may compromise the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds. The application of the Act may be further defined or refined through subordinate instruments, which can include regulations or other legislative instruments that provide additional detail or clarification on specific aspects of the Act. Any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds are typically outlined in these subordinate instruments or within the Act itself, ensuring that certain categories of entities or conduct may be exempt under specified conditions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) includes provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act, as evidenced in subsection 126A(1). Under this subsection, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, such as Ivan Parrett, may disqualify an individual from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that manages superannuation entities. In the case of Mrs Katrina Rosalie Masters, Mr Parrett has issued a notice of disqualification (section 126A(6)) based on his satisfaction that she has contravened the SIS Act multiple times, with the seriousness of these contraventions warranting such a decision.
The disqualification order, which takes immediate effect on the day of the notice (16 October 2012), prevents Mrs Masters from serving in any capacity that involves managing superannuation entities. This restriction is crucial for ensuring compliance and integrity within the superannuation industry. Additionally, the Act mandates that particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette, as outlined in subsection 126A(7). This public disclosure serves to inform the public and relevant stakeholders of the disqualification, thereby maintaining transparency and accountability.
In terms of obligations, the Act imposes several requirements on individuals and entities governed by it. For instance, trustees and responsible officers must adhere to the provisions of the SIS Act to avoid disqualification. This includes compliance with various regulations concerning the management and administration of superannuation funds. Mrs Masters, having been disqualified, must now refrain from any activities that involve managing or influencing superannuation entities. Furthermore, the Act allows for the revocation of such disqualification orders under subsection 126A(5), either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified individual.
Should Mrs Masters or any other affected party be dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, they have the right to request reconsideration by the Commissioner. This request, as per section 344 of the SIS Act, must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should include the reasons for the request. This mechanism ensures that there is a formal process for addressing grievances and potentially reversing the disqualification if the decision is deemed unjust.