NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mrs Katherine Jaques
SYDNEY NSW
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 11 July 2016
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Lazzaroni
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust regulation and oversight of superannuation entities, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and the interests of members. The Act was introduced to provide a comprehensive framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry, addressing gaps in previous legislation and enhancing accountability within the sector. The SISA was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, aiming to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation members and promote confidence in the superannuation system. The policy objective behind the SISA is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation industry by ensuring that entities and individuals involved in the administration of superannuation funds meet stringent standards of fitness and propriety. This is achieved through measures such as the disqualification of individuals deemed unfit to hold positions of trust within superannuation entities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a Commonwealth Act that applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and regulation of superannuation funds in Australia. It extends its jurisdiction to all trustees, directors, and authorised officers of superannuation entities, as well as to the funds themselves. The Act aims to ensure that superannuation entities are managed with integrity and in the best interests of the fund members, establishing standards of conduct and governance. It covers a wide range of conduct and transactions related to the management and operation of superannuation funds, including investment decisions, reporting requirements, and trustee responsibilities. The Act applies nationally, covering all superannuation entities operating within Australia, regardless of state or territory boundaries. The SISA includes provisions for disqualification of individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds, with specific powers granted to the Commissioner of Taxation or their delegates to disqualify individuals under subsection 126A(3). The geographic reach of the Act is therefore comprehensive, applying to entities and individuals across the entire country. Exclusions and exemptions within the Act are minimal, focusing primarily on clearly defined roles and responsibilities of trustees and other entities involved in superannuation management. The application of the Act can be further detailed and clarified through subordinate instruments, such as regulations and guidelines issued by the Commissioner of Taxation.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes several key provisions that relate to the regulation and oversight of superannuation entities in Australia. Section 126A, in particular, provides mechanisms for disqualifying individuals who are deemed unfit to serve as trustees of a superannuation entity. Subsection 126A(3) allows for disqualification of a person if a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation is satisfied that the individual is not a fit and proper person to hold such a position. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance, as stipulated in subsection 126A(6).
Under the SISA, the disqualification of an individual like Mrs Katherine Jaques imposes specific obligations and requirements. For example, once disqualified, the individual is barred from acting as a trustee for any superannuation entity, and any associated responsibilities must be immediately relinquished. This is intended to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and ensure that only those deemed suitable by the Commissioner of Taxation manage these funds.
In the case of a breach of the provisions outlined in the SISA, there are potential criminal and civil consequences. Offences under the SISA can include actions that contribute to the mismanagement or improper administration of superannuation funds. The maximum penalties for such offences can be severe, reflecting the critical nature of the responsibilities associated with managing superannuation entities. These penalties may include substantial fines or imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent of the breach. It is also important to note that the Commissioner of Taxation has the authority to revoke a disqualification notice under subsection 126A(5), either on their own initiative or in response to a written application from the disqualified individual.
Further, the SISA provides avenues for recourse in the event of a disqualification decision. Section 344 allows any affected individual to request a reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and must detail the reasons for the reconsideration. This ensures that individuals have a formal process to challenge decisions that may adversely affect their professional capabilities and reputations.